PubMed

Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness.

Iliev ME, Goldblum D, Katsoulis K, Amstutz C, Frueh B.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jul;90(7):833-5. Epub 2006 May 3.PMID: 16672330 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.

Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Brusini P.

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 May;85(3):272-9.PMID: 17488456 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.

Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, Chopra V, Pena F, Azen S, Varma R; Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group.

Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):20-6. Epub 2006 Oct 27.PMID: 17070592 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.

Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;243(8):763-7. Epub 2005 Mar 9.PMID: 15756572 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.

Schneider E, Grehn F.

J Glaucoma. 2006 Feb;15(1):2-6.PMID: 16378009 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

[Rebound tonometry in a clinical setting. Comparison with applanation tonometry]

López-Caballero C, Contreras I, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Rebolleda G, Cabrejas L, Marcelo P.

Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2007 May;82(5):273-8. Spanish. PMID: 17516263 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry.

Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, Bostrom A, Nee M, Stamper RL.

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov;123(11):1532-7.PMID: 16286615 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.

Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Dec;89(12):1572-5.PMID: 16299132 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements.

Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, Mendez-Hernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Oct;47(10):4410-4.PMID: 17003433 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.

Hager A, Loge K, Schroeder B, Füllhas MO, Wiegand W.

J Glaucoma. 2008 Aug;17(5):361-5. Erratum in: J Glaucoma. 2008 Oct-Nov;17(7):604. Annette, Hager [corrected to Hager, Annette]; Kristina, Loge [corrected to Loge, Kristina]; Bernd, Schroeder [corrected to Schroeder, Bernd]; Mark-Oliver, Füllhas [corrected to Füllhas, Mark-Oliver]; Wolfgang, Wiegand [corrected to Wiegand, Wolfgang]. PMID: 18703945 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects.

Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN.

Ophthalmology. 2007 Apr;114(4):658-65. Epub 2006 Nov 30.PMID: 17141320 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.

Barleon L, Hoffmann EM, Berres M, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct;142(4):583-90.PMID: 17011849 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Effect of central corneal thickness on dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Grieshaber MC, Schoetzau A, Zawinka C, Flammer J, Orgul S.

Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Jun;125(6):740-4.PMID: 17562982 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Pakrou N, Gray T, Mills R, Landers J, Craig J.

J Glaucoma. 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1):43-7.PMID: 18303384 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.

Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;145(2):215-221.PMID: 18222191 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness.

Doyle A, Lachkar Y.

J Glaucoma. 2005 Aug;14(4):288-92.PMID: 15990609 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas.

Ozbek Z, Cohen EJ, Hammersmith KM, Rapuano CJ.

Cornea. 2006 Sep;25(8):890-4.PMID: 17102662 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.

Lanza M, Borrelli M, De Bernardo M, Filosa ML, Rosa N.

J Glaucoma. 2008 Sep;17(6):460-4.PMID: 18794680 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.

Sahin A, Niyaz L, Yildirim N.

Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2007 May-Jun;35(4):335-9.PMID: 17539785 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness.

Poostchi A, Mitchell R, Nicholas S, Purdie G, Wells A.

Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;37(7):687-91.PMID: 19788665 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles