Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 152

    1.

    Comparison of disc damage likelihood scale, cup to disc ratio, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in the diagnosis of glaucoma.

    Danesh-Meyer HV, Gaskin BJ, Jayusundera T, Donaldson M, Gamble GD.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Apr;90(4):437-41.PMID: 16547323 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Regional correlation of structure and function in glaucoma, using the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, and visual fields.

    Danesh-Meyer HV, Ku JY, Papchenko TL, Jayasundera T, Hsiang JC, Gamble GD.

    Ophthalmology. 2006 Apr;113(4):603-11. Epub 2006 Feb 14.PMID: 16483660 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    ROC analysis of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph optic disc shape measures in glaucoma.

    Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Swindale NV, Drance SM.

    Can J Ophthalmol. 1997 Oct;32(6):382-8.PMID: 9363342 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Diagnostic accuracy of the Moorfields Regression Analysis using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in glaucoma patients with visual field defects.

    Medved N, Cvenkel B.

    Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar-Apr;17(2):216-22.PMID: 17415695 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Glaucoma follow-up by the Heidelberg retina tomograph--new graphical analysis of optic disc topography changes.

    Kalaboukhova L, Fridhammar V, Lindblom B.

    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Jun;244(6):654-62. Epub 2005 Oct 12.PMID: 16220279 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Clinical ability of Heidelberg retinal tomograph examination to detect glaucomatous visual field changes.

    Miglior S, Casula M, Guareschi M, Marchetti I, Iester M, Orzalesi N.

    Ophthalmology. 2001 Sep;108(9):1621-7.PMID: 11535460 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Validity of screening for glaucomatous optic nerve damage using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II) in high-risk populations: a pilot study.

    Harasymowycz PJ, Papamatheakis DG, Fansi AK, Gresset J, Lesk MR.

    Ophthalmology. 2005 Dec;112(12):2164-71.PMID: 16325710 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score.

    Zangwill LM, Jain S, Racette L, Ernstrom KB, Bowd C, Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jun;48(6):2653-60.PMID: 17525196 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.

    Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;48(3):1173-80.PMID: 17325161 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    Correlation of Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, visual field, and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II in patients with glaucoma.

    Hornova J, Kuntz Navarro JB, Prasad A, Freitas DG, Nunes CM.

    Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep-Oct;18(5):739-47.PMID: 18850552 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma.

    Spaeth GL, Henderer J, Liu C, Kesen M, Altangerel U, Bayer A, Katz LJ, Myers J, Rhee D, Steinmann W.

    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100:181-5; discussion 185-6.PMID: 12545692 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes.

    De León-Ortega JE, Sakata LM, Monheit BE, McGwin G Jr, Arthur SN, Girkin CA.

    Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct;144(4):525-32. Epub 2007 Aug 13.PMID: 17693382 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Evaluating a new disc staging scale for glaucomatous damage: the ability to detect change over time.

    Henderer J, Wang Y, Bayer A, Altangerel U, Schwartz L, Schmidt C.

    Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009 May-Jun;19(3):404-10.PMID: 19396786 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Variables affecting test-retest variability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II stereometric parameters.

    Sihota R, Gulati V, Agarwal HC, Saxena R, Sharma A, Pandey RM.

    J Glaucoma. 2002 Aug;11(4):321-8.PMID: 12169969 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.

    Oddone F, Centofanti M, Iester M, Rossetti L, Fogagnolo P, Michelessi M, Capris E, Manni G.

    Ophthalmology. 2009 Jun;116(6):1106-11.e1-3. Epub 2009 Apr 19.PMID: 19376590 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score.

    Coops A, Henson DB, Kwartz AJ, Artes PH.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Dec;47(12):5348-55.PMID: 17122123 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph.

    Miglior S, Guareschi M, Albe' E, Gomarasca S, Vavassori M, Orzalesi N.

    Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul;136(1):26-33.PMID: 12834666 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    [Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II topographic parameters, diagnostic capabilities of moorfields regression analysis, and their affecting factors]

    Nakano S, Takita T, Imaizumi M, Nakatsuka K.

    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2006 Dec;110(12):943-9. Japanese. PMID: 17228757 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    The use of RADAAR (ratio of rim area to disc area asymmetry) in detecting glaucoma and its severity.

    Harasymowycz P, Davis B, Xu G, Myers J, Bayer A, Spaeth GL.

    Can J Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;39(3):240-4.PMID: 15180140 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data