Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 276

    1.

    Methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies: a survey of reviews of basic research.

    Mignini LE, Khan KS.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Mar 13;6:10.PMID: 16533396 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    A review of the methodological features of systematic reviews in fetal medicine.

    Knox EM, Thangaratinam S, Kilby MD, Khan KS.

    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Oct;146(2):121-8. Epub 2009 Jun 9.PMID: 19515478 [PubMed - in process]Related articles

    3.

    A review of the methodological features of systematic reviews in maternal medicine.

    Sheikh L, Johnston S, Thangaratinam S, Kilby MD, Khan KS.

    BMC Med. 2007 May 24;5:10. Review.PMID: 17524137 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    A review of methodological quality of systematic reviews on multiple pregnancies.

    Jayaram PM, Khan KS.

    J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Nov;26(8):731-5. Review.PMID: 17130017 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Reviewing existing knowledge prior to conducting animal studies.

    Knight A.

    Altern Lab Anim. 2008 Dec;36(6):709-12.PMID: 19154097 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    The science of systematic reviewing studies of diagnostic tests.

    Oosterhuis WP, Niessen RW, Bossuyt PM.

    Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000 Jul;38(7):577-88. Review.PMID: 11028761 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study.

    Moja LP, Telaro E, D'Amico R, Moschetti I, Coe L, Liberati A.

    BMJ. 2005 May 7;330(7499):1053. Epub 2005 Apr 7.PMID: 15817526 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects.

    Golder S, Loke Y, McIntosh HM.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jan 27;6:3.PMID: 16441876 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations.

    Horvath AR, Pewsner D.

    Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Apr;342(1-2):23-39. Review.PMID: 15026264 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools.

    Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Dinnes J, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jan;58(1):1-12. Review.PMID: 15649665 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal experiments with guidelines for reporting.

    Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Rushton L, Abrams KR.

    J Environ Sci Health B. 2006;41(7):1245-58. Review.PMID: 16923604 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.

    Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Laupland K, Manns B, Doig C.

    Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):589-94.PMID: 17205029 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.

    Engberg S.

    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008 May-Jun;35(3):258-65. Review.PMID: 18496080 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry.

    Bader J, Ismail A; ADA Council on Scientific Affairs; Division of Science; Journal of the American Dental Association.

    J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Apr;135(4):464-73.PMID: 15127870 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.

    Kelly KD, Travers A, Dorgan M, Slater L, Rowe BH.

    Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;38(5):518-26.PMID: 11679863 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature.

    Honest H, Khan KS.

    BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2(1):4. Epub 2002 Mar 7.PMID: 11884248 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Systematic reviews of diagnostic research. Considerations about assessment and incorporation of methodological quality.

    de Vet HC, van der Weijden T, Muris JW, Heyrman J, Buntinx F, Knottnerus JA.

    Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(4):301-6.PMID: 11767953 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Judging the 'weight of evidence' in systematic reviews: introducing rigour into the qualitative overview stage by assessing Signal and Noise.

    Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, Rollnick S.

    J Eval Clin Pract. 2000 May;6(2):177-84.PMID: 10970011 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Quality-assessed reviews of health care interventions and the database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness (DARE). NHS CRD Review, Dissemination, and Information Teams.

    Petticrew M, Song F, Wilson P, Wright K.

    Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Fall;15(4):671-8.PMID: 10645108 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Display Settings:

    Format
    Items per page
    Sort by

    Send to:

    Choose Destination