My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 714

    1.

    Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case.

    Sox HC, Rennie D.

    Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):609-13. Epub 2006 Mar 6.PMID: 16522625 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Scientific misconduct and correcting the scientific literature.

    Parrish DM.

    Acad Med. 1999 Mar;74(3):221-30. Erratum in: Acad Med 1999 Jun;74(6):621. PMID: 10099640 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication.

    Friedman PJ.

    JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1416-9.PMID: 2406474 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature.

    Pfeifer MP, Snodgrass GL.

    JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1420-3.PMID: 2406475 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct.

    Neale AV, Northrup J, Dailey R, Marks E, Abrams J.

    Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Mar;13(1):5-24.PMID: 17703606 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    [Stop citing fraudulent and duplicate articles]

    Maisonneuve H.

    Presse Med. 2007 May;36(5 Pt 1):749-52. Epub 2007 Mar 29. French. No abstract available. PMID: 17398065 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Role of the journal editor in sustaining integrity in research.

    Caelleigh AS.

    Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9 Suppl):S23-9.PMID: 8373488 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?

    Nath SB, Marcus SC, Druss BG.

    Med J Aust. 2006 Aug 7;185(3):152-4.PMID: 16893357 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Ethical and legal considerations in a case of research fraud.

    Kvaal SI.

    J Am Coll Dent. 2008 Summer;75(2):29-35.PMID: 18777891 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Many journals have not retracted "fraudulent" research.

    Cooper-Mahkorn D.

    BMJ. 1998 Jun 20;316(7148):1850. No abstract available. PMID: 11645074 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Scientific journals and their authors' financial interests: a pilot study.

    Krimsky S, Rothenberg LS, Stott P, Kyle G.

    Psychother Psychosom. 1998 Jul-Oct;67(4-5):194-201.PMID: 9693346 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.

    Couzin J, Unger K.

    Science. 2006 Apr 7;312(5770):38-43. No abstract available. PMID: 16601164 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Fraud. The journal's role concerning fraudulent research.

    Sharp DW.

    Invest Radiol. 1991 Jun;26(6):586-9. No abstract available. PMID: 1860767 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Phenomena of retraction: reasons for retraction and citations to the publications.

    Budd JM, Sievert M, Schultz TR.

    JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):296-7.PMID: 9676689 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    The scientific community's response to evidence of fraudulent publication. The Robert Slutsky case.

    Whitely WP, Rennie D, Hafner AW.

    JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):170-3.PMID: 8015137 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    The impact of fraudulent research on the scientific literature. The Stephen E. Breuning case.

    Garfield E, Welljams-Dorof A.

    JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1424-6.PMID: 2406476 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Role of editors and journals in detecting and preventing scientific misconduct: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

    Marusic A, Katavic V, Marusic M.

    Med Law. 2007 Sep;26(3):545-66.PMID: 17970252 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Empirical developments in retraction.

    Redman BK, Yarandi HN, Merz JF.

    J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):807-9.PMID: 18974415 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals.

    Atlas MC.

    J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Apr;92(2):242-50. Review.PMID: 15098054 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers.

    Trikalinos NA, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):464-70.PMID: 18394539 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity