My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 342

    1.

    Does sampling using random digit dialling really cost more than sampling from telephone directories: debunking the myths.

    Yang B, Eyeson-Annan M.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Feb 24;6:6.PMID: 16504117 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Random digit dialling and Electronic White Pages samples compared: demographic profiles and health estimates.

    Wilson DH, Starr GJ, Taylor AW, Dal Grande E.

    Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999 Dec;23(6):627-33.PMID: 10641355 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    The experience of using random digit dialling methods in a population-based chronic pain study.

    Blyth FM, March LM, Shellard D, Cousins MJ.

    Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002 Dec;26(6):511-4.PMID: 12530793 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Non-response to a life course socioeconomic position indicator in surveillance: comparison of telephone and face-to-face modes.

    Chittleborough CR, Taylor AW, Baum FE, Hiller JE.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Aug 13;8:54.PMID: 18700038 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Differences in health estimates using telephone and door-to-door survey methods--a hypothetical exercise.

    Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wakefield M.

    Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998 Apr;22(2):223-6.PMID: 9744181 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    The New Zealand Partner Relations Survey: methodological results of a national telephone survey.

    Davis PB, Yee RL, Chetwynd J, McMillan N.

    AIDS. 1993 Nov;7(11):1509-16.PMID: 8280419 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Adjustments for non-telephone bias in random-digit-dialling surveys.

    Frankel MR, Srinath KP, Hoaglin DC, Battaglia MP, Smith PJ, Wright RA, Khare M.

    Stat Med. 2003 May 15;22(9):1611-26.PMID: 12704619 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Random digit dialing and directory-based samples in telephone surveys of HIV risk: a comparison from the Australian Study of Health and Relationships.

    Smith AM, de Visser RO, Rissel CE.

    Ann Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;15(3):232-5.PMID: 15723770 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Evaluation of bias and logistics in a survey of adults at increased risk for oral health decrements.

    Gilbert GH, Duncan RP, Kulley AM, Coward RT, Heft MW.

    J Public Health Dent. 1997 Winter;57(1):48-58.PMID: 9150063 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    The adequacy of household survey data for evaluating the nongroup health insurance market.

    Cantor JC, Monheit AC, Brownlee S, Schneider C.

    Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1739-57.PMID: 17610446 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    [Differences between listed and unlisted telephone subscribers among telephone survey respondents]

    Kigawa M, Nishikawa H.

    Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1998 Apr;45(4):309-19. Japanese. PMID: 9691661 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    A comparison of results from an alcohol survey of a prerecruited Internet panel and the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

    Heeren T, Edwards EM, Dennis JM, Rodkin S, Hingson RW, Rosenbloom DL.

    Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Feb;32(2):222-9. Epub 2007 Dec 21.PMID: 18162076 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Computer assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) for health surveys in public health surveillance: methodological issues and challenges ahead.

    Choi BC.

    Chronic Dis Can. 2004 Spring;25(2):21-7. Review.PMID: 15554608 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Maximising response rates in household telephone surveys.

    O'Toole J, Sinclair M, Leder K.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Nov 3;8:71.PMID: 18980694 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    Measuring health behaviors and landline telephones: potential coverage bias in a low-income, rural population.

    Shebl F, Poppell CE, Zhan M, Dwyer DM, Hopkins AB, Groves C, Reed F, Devadason C, Steinberger EK.

    Public Health Rep. 2009 Jul-Aug;124(4):495-502.PMID: 19618786 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Telephone surveys in public health research.

    Marcus AC, Crane LA.

    Med Care. 1986 Feb;24(2):97-112.PMID: 3945137 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Commentary: Trade-offs in the development of a sample design for case-control studies.

    DiGaetano R, Waksberg J.

    Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Apr 15;155(8):771-5.PMID: 11943696 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    Selection bias from sampling frames: telephone directory and electoral roll compared with door-to-door population census: results from the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

    Smith W, Mitchell P, Attebo K, Leeder S.

    Aust N Z J Public Health. 1997 Apr;21(2):127-33.PMID: 9161066 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    [Surveillance of risk factors for chronic diseases through telephone interviews]

    Monteiro CA, de Moura EC, Jaime PC, Lucca A, Florindo AA, Figueiredo IC, Bernal R, da Silva NN.

    Rev Saude Publica. 2005 Feb;39(1):47-57. Epub 2005 Jan 11. Portuguese. PMID: 15654460 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Comparison of control subjects recruited by random digit dialing and area survey.

    Lele C, Holly EA, Roseman DS, Thomas DB.

    Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Oct 1;140(7):643-8.PMID: 7942764 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Display Settings:

    Format
    Items per page
    Sort by

    Send to:

    Choose Destination

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity