Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination
  • Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...

Results: 1 to 20 of 228

1.

A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature.

Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Manns B, Laupland KB, Doig CJ.

Crit Care. 2005 Oct 5;9(5):R575-82. Epub 2005 Sep 9. Review.PMID: 16277721 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

2.

The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.

Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Laupland K, Manns B, Doig C.

Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):589-94.PMID: 17205029 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

3.

Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.

Bereza BG, Machado M, Einarson TR.

Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;42(10):1402-9. Epub 2008 Sep 2.PMID: 18728102 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

4.

Evaluation of meta-analyses in the otolaryngological literature.

Rudmik LR, Walen SG, Dixon E, Dort J.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Aug;139(2):187-94. Review.PMID: 18656713 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

5.

Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal.

Dixon E, Hameed M, Sutherland F, Cook DJ, Doig C.

Ann Surg. 2005 Mar;241(3):450-9.PMID: 15729067 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

6.

Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews.

Al Faleh K, Al-Omran M.

BMC Pediatr. 2009 Jun 17;9:38.PMID: 19534780 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

7.

Methodology and reporting quality of systematic review/meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine.

Junhua Z, Hongcai S, Xiumei G, Boli Z, Yaozu X, Hongbo C, Ming R.

J Altern Complement Med. 2007 Oct;13(8):797-805.PMID: 17983335 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

8.

[Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews]

Davoli M, Amato L, Minozzi S, Bargagli AM, Vecchi S, Perucci CA.

Epidemiol Prev. 2005 May-Aug;29(3-4 Suppl):3-63. Italian. PMID: 16529350 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

9.

Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions.

Hopewell S, McDonald S, Clarke M, Egger M.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):MR000010. Review.PMID: 17443631 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

10.

Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.

Dundar Y, Dodd S, Dickson R, Walley T, Haycox A, Williamson PR.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. Review.PMID: 16487455 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

11.

Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.

Shea B, Bouter LM, Grimshaw JM, Francis D, Ortiz Z, Wells GA, Tugwell PS, Boers M.

J Rheumatol. 2006 Jan;33(1):9-15. Epub 2005 Nov 1.PMID: 16267878 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

12.

The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.

Wen J, Ren Y, Wang L, Li Y, Liu Y, Zhou M, Liu P, Ye L, Li Y, Tian W.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;61(8):770-5. Epub 2008 Apr 14.PMID: 18411041 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

13.

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D.

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):W65-94. Epub 2009 Jul 20.PMID: 19622512 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

14.

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

Shea B, Boers M, Grimshaw JM, Hamel C, Bouter LM.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jun 13;6:27.PMID: 16772030 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

15.

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D.

BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700.PMID: 19622552 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

16.

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D.

PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100. Epub 2009 Jul 21.PMID: 19621070 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

17.

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 3: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials.

Manchikanti L, Benyamin RM, Helm S, Hirsch JA.

Pain Physician. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):35-72. Review.PMID: 19165297 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

18.

Methodological quality of systematic reviews analyzing the use of laser therapy in restorative dentistry.

Salmos J, Gerbi ME, Braz R, Andrade ES, Vasconcelos BC, Bessa-Nogueira RV.

Lasers Med Sci. 2009 Oct 8. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 19813047 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]Related articles

20.

[Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals]

Liu JP, Xia Y.

Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2007 Apr;27(4):306-11. Chinese. PMID: 17526167 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Supplemental Content

Find related data

Recent activity