Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 499

    2.

    Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study.

    Decullier E, Lhéritier V, Chapuis F.

    BMJ. 2005 Jul 2;331(7507):19. Epub 2005 Jun 20.PMID: 15967761 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.

    Dal-Ré R, Espada J, Ortega R.

    J Med Ethics. 1999 Jun;25(3):268-73.PMID: 10390685 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Acceptability and profile of the clinical drug trials underway in Finnish university hospitals in the 1990s: applications reviewed by ethics committees.

    Keinonen T, Nieminen S, Saareks V, Saano V, Ylitalo P.

    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Sep;23(7):415-23.PMID: 11771857 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Oral presentation bias: a retrospective cohort study.

    Decullier E, Chapuis F.

    J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Mar;61(3):190-3.PMID: 17325393 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Nature and extent of changes in the patient's information sheets of international multicentre clinical trials as requested by Spanish Research Ethics Committees.

    Dal-Ré R, Morejón E, Ortega R.

    Med Clin (Barc). 2004 Dec 4;123(20):770-4.PMID: 15607068 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Impact of funding on biomedical research: a retrospective cohort study.

    Decullier E, Chapuis F.

    BMC Public Health. 2006 Jun 22;6:165.PMID: 16792794 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.

    Tully J, Ninis N, Booy R, Viner R.

    BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1179-82.PMID: 10784541 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Should local research ethics committees monitor research they have approved?

    Pickworth E.

    J Med Ethics. 2000 Oct;26(5):330-3.PMID: 11055034 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    Local research ethics committees. Widely differing responses to a national survey protocol.

    Harries UJ, Fentem PH, Tuxworth W, Hoinville GW.

    J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Mar-Apr;28(2):150-4.PMID: 8006869 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Delays and diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees.

    Ahmed AH, Nicholson KG.

    J Med Ethics. 1996 Oct;22(5):263-6.PMID: 8910776 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    [Study over 10 years of 622 protocols receiving unfavourable reports from 19 research ethics committees]

    Fauriel I, Moutel G, Callies I, Hervé C.

    Therapie. 2005 Mar-Apr;60(2):159-65. French. PMID: 15969318 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Clinical trials in Italy: focus on the protocols submitted to ethics committees.

    Venturini F, Alberti C, Alberti MP, Scroccaro G.

    J Clin Pharm Ther. 2001 Apr;26(2):103-10.PMID: 11350532 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Trust and confidence: towards mutual acceptance of ethics committee approval of multicentre studies.

    Sarson-Lawrence M, Alt C, Mok MT, Dodds M, Rosenthal MA.

    Intern Med J. 2004 Nov;34(11):598-603.PMID: 15546452 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Moral reasoning in biomedical research protocols.

    Holm S.

    Scand J Soc Med. 1994 Jun;22(2):81-5.PMID: 8091159 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Improving protection for research subjects in France: analysis of regional ethics committees.

    Fauriel I, Moutel G, Duchange N, Callies I, François I, Huriet C, Hervé C.

    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2004 Dec;40(3):312-8.PMID: 15546685 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Reviewing the reviewers: a survey of institutional ethics committees in Australia.

    McNeill PM, Berglund CA, Webster IW.

    Med J Aust. 1990 Mar 19;152(6):289-96.PMID: 2314331 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Informing potential participants of local research ethics committee approval of research protocols.

    Beyleveld D, Longley D.

    Med Law Int. 1998;3(2-3):209-22. No abstract available. PMID: 11657596 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Display Settings:

    Format
    Items per page
    Sort by

    Send to:

    Choose Destination