My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 182

    1.

    Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms.

    Chou R, Helfand M.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1090-9. Review.PMID: 15968034 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program.

    Chou R, Aronson N, Atkins D, Ismaila AS, Santaguida P, Smith DH, Whitlock E, Wilt TJ, Moher D.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Sep 25. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 18823754 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]Related articles

    3.

    Challenges in systematic reviews of therapeutic devices and procedures.

    Hartling L, McAlister FA, Rowe BH, Ezekowitz J, Friesen C, Klassen TP.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1100-11. Review.PMID: 15968035 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Challenges in systematic reviews of educational intervention studies.

    Reed D, Price EG, Windish DM, Wright SM, Gozu A, Hsu EB, Beach MC, Kern D, Bass EB.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1080-9. Review.PMID: 15968033 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions.

    Norris SL, Atkins D.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1112-9. Review.PMID: 15968036 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    State-of-the-evidence reviews: advantages and challenges of including grey literature.

    Benzies KM, Premji S, Hayden KA, Serrett K.

    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2006;3(2):55-61.PMID: 17040510 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.

    Williams C, Brunskill S, Altman D, Briggs A, Campbell H, Clarke M, Glanville J, Gray A, Harris A, Johnston K, Lodge M.

    Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. Review.PMID: 16959170 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Challenges in systematic reviews that evaluate drug efficacy or effectiveness.

    Santaguida PL, Helfand M, Raina P.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1066-72. Review.PMID: 15968031 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Assessing harmful effects in systematic reviews.

    McIntosh HM, Woolacott NF, Bagnall AM.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 Jul 19;4:19.PMID: 15260887 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Improving depiction of benefits and harms: analyses of studies of well-known therapeutics and review of high-impact medical journals.

    Sedrakyan A, Shih C.

    Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S23-8.PMID: 17909378 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Methodological shortcomings predicted lower harm estimates in one of two sets of studies of clinical interventions.

    Chou R, Fu R, Carson S, Saha S, Helfand M.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):18-28. Epub 2006 Sep 7. Review.PMID: 17161750 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    [Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews]

    Davoli M, Amato L, Minozzi S, Bargagli AM, Vecchi S, Perucci CA.

    Epidemiol Prev. 2005 May-Aug;29(3-4 Suppl):3-63. Italian. PMID: 16529350 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.

    Manchikanti L.

    Pain Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):161-86. Review.PMID: 18354710 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    14.

    Methodological issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies in orthopaedic research.

    Simunovic N, Sprague S, Bhandari M.

    J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91 Suppl 3:87-94.PMID: 19411505 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Methodology and reporting quality of systematic review/meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine.

    Junhua Z, Hongcai S, Xiumei G, Boli Z, Yaozu X, Hongbo C, Ming R.

    J Altern Complement Med. 2007 Oct;13(8):797-805.PMID: 17983335 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Availability of large-scale evidence on specific harms from systematic reviews of randomized trials.

    Papanikolaou PN, Ioannidis JP.

    Am J Med. 2004 Oct 15;117(8):582-9. Review.PMID: 15465507 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Using evidence in pain practice: Part II: Interpreting and applying systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.

    Chou R.

    Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):531-41. Review.PMID: 18346061 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Systematic reviews: the heart of evidence-based practice.

    Stevens KR.

    AACN Clin Issues. 2001 Nov;12(4):529-38. Review.PMID: 11759425 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.

    Tatsioni A, Zarin DA, Aronson N, Samson DJ, Flamm CR, Schmid C, Lau J.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. Review.PMID: 15968029 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline.

    Chou R, Huffman LH; American Pain Society; American College of Physicians.

    Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):505-14. Review. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 5;148(3):247-8. PMID: 17909211 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity