Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 226

    1.

    Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.

    Tatsioni A, Zarin DA, Aronson N, Samson DJ, Flamm CR, Schmid C, Lau J.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. Review.PMID: 15968029 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    [Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews]

    Davoli M, Amato L, Minozzi S, Bargagli AM, Vecchi S, Perucci CA.

    Epidemiol Prev. 2005 May-Aug;29(3-4 Suppl):3-63. Italian. PMID: 16529350 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations.

    Horvath AR, Pewsner D.

    Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Apr;342(1-2):23-39. Review.PMID: 15026264 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.

    Williams C, Brunskill S, Altman D, Briggs A, Campbell H, Clarke M, Glanville J, Gray A, Harris A, Johnston K, Lodge M.

    Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. Review.PMID: 16959170 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Challenges in systematic reviews of educational intervention studies.

    Reed D, Price EG, Windish DM, Wright SM, Gozu A, Hsu EB, Beach MC, Kern D, Bass EB.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1080-9. Review.PMID: 15968033 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    Impact of adjustment for quality on results of metaanalyses of diagnostic accuracy.

    Leeflang M, Reitsma J, Scholten R, Rutjes A, Di Nisio M, Deeks J, Bossuyt P.

    Clin Chem. 2007 Feb;53(2):164-72. Epub 2006 Dec 21.PMID: 17185365 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.

    Hollingworth W, Medina LS, Lenkinski RE, Shibata DK, Bernal B, Zurakowski D, Comstock B, Jarvik JG.

    Acad Radiol. 2006 Jul;13(7):803-10.PMID: 16777553 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening test accuracy evaluations: methodologic primer.

    Gatsonis C, Paliwal P.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Aug;187(2):271-81.PMID: 16861527 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.

    Martin JL, Williams KS, Abrams KR, Turner DA, Sutton AJ, Chapple C, Assassa RP, Shaw C, Cheater F.

    Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(6):1-132, iii-iv. Review.PMID: 16487456 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    Challenges in systematic reviews of therapeutic devices and procedures.

    Hartling L, McAlister FA, Rowe BH, Ezekowitz J, Friesen C, Klassen TP.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1100-11. Review.PMID: 15968035 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    Diagnostic tests and algorithms used in the investigation of haematuria: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.

    Rodgers M, Nixon J, Hempel S, Aho T, Kelly J, Neal D, Duffy S, Ritchie G, Kleijnen J, Westwood M.

    Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jun;10(18):iii-iv, xi-259. Review.PMID: 16729917 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods]

    Watine J.

    Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2004 Nov-Dec;62(6):611-27. French. PMID: 15563420 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    14.

    A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions.

    Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Micucci S.

    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1(3):176-84.PMID: 17163895 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Challenges in systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine topics.

    Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Suttorp MJ, Buscemi N, Friesen C; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1042-7. Review.PMID: 15968028 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines.

    Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, Montori VM, de Vet HC, van der Windt DA, Bezemer PD.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002 Jul 3;2:9.PMID: 12097142 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.

    Manchikanti L, Derby R, Wolfer L, Singh V, Datta S, Hirsch JA.

    Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):517-40. Review.PMID: 19461821 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms.

    Chou R, Helfand M.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1090-9. Review.PMID: 15968034 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions.

    Norris SL, Atkins D.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1112-9. Review.PMID: 15968036 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies.

    Whiting P, Harbord R, Kleijnen J.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 May 26;5:19. Review.PMID: 15918898 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data