My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 477

    1.

    Challenges in systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine topics.

    Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Suttorp MJ, Buscemi N, Friesen C; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1042-7. Review.PMID: 15968028 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Evidence based complementary and alternative medicine: promises and problems.

    Coulter ID.

    Forsch Komplementmed. 2007 Apr;14(2):102-8. Epub 2007 Apr 23.PMID: 17464161 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Challenges in systematic reviews of therapeutic devices and procedures.

    Hartling L, McAlister FA, Rowe BH, Ezekowitz J, Friesen C, Klassen TP.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1100-11. Review.PMID: 15968035 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine.

    Linde K, Willich SN.

    J R Soc Med. 2003 Jan;96(1):17-22.PMID: 12519797 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine.

    Moher D, Soeken K, Sampson M, Ben-Porat L, Berman B.

    BMC Pediatr. 2002;2:3. Epub 2002 Feb 27.PMID: 11914146 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    Building an evidence house: challenges and solutions to research in complementary and alternative medicine.

    Jonas WB.

    Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2005 Jun;12(3):159-67. Epub 2005 Jun 23. Review.PMID: 15985781 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    The evidence base for complementary and alternative medicine: methods of Evidence Mapping with application to CAM.

    Katz DL, Williams AL, Girard C, Goodman J, Comerford B, Behrman A, Bracken MB.

    Altern Ther Health Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;9(4):22-30. Review.PMID: 12868249 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Research on complementary and alternative medicine using randomized controlled trials.

    Harlan WR Jr.

    J Altern Complement Med. 2001;7 Suppl 1:S45-52. Review.PMID: 11822635 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Evidence summaries and synthesis: necessary but insufficient approach for determining clinical practice of integrated medicine?

    Coulter ID.

    Integr Cancer Ther. 2006 Dec;5(4):282-6.PMID: 17101756 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".

    Young LJ.

    MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57. No abstract available. PMID: 17977087 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".

    Varner J.

    MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57. No abstract available. PMID: 17977086 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".

    Miller HL.

    MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57. No abstract available. PMID: 17977085 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".

    Fahey SR.

    MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57. No abstract available. PMID: 17977084 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".

    Levine B.

    MedGenMed. 2007 Jun 13;9(2):57; author reply 57. No abstract available. PMID: 17955111 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    New opportunities and proven approaches in complementary and alternative medicine research at the National Institutes of Health.

    Harlan WR Jr.

    J Altern Complement Med. 2001;7 Suppl 1:S53-9. Review.PMID: 11822636 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.

    Tatsioni A, Zarin DA, Aronson N, Samson DJ, Flamm CR, Schmid C, Lau J.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. Review.PMID: 15968029 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Challenges in systematic reviews of educational intervention studies.

    Reed D, Price EG, Windish DM, Wright SM, Gozu A, Hsu EB, Beach MC, Kern D, Bass EB.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1080-9. Review.PMID: 15968033 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    A collaborative effort to apply the evidence-based review process to the field of nutrition: challenges, benefits, and lessons learned.

    Balk EM, Horsley TA, Newberry SJ, Lichtenstein AH, Yetley EA, Schachter HM, Moher D, MacLean CH, Lau J.

    Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jun;85(6):1448-56. Review.PMID: 17556679 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions.

    Norris SL, Atkins D.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1112-9. Review.PMID: 15968036 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Systematic reviews: the heart of evidence-based practice.

    Stevens KR.

    AACN Clin Issues. 2001 Nov;12(4):529-38. Review.PMID: 11759425 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity