Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 577

    1.

    A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.

    Tonnu PA, Ho T, Sharma K, White E, Bunce C, Garway-Heath D.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul;89(7):847-50.PMID: 15965164 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

    Tonnu PA, Ho T, Newson T, El Sheikh A, Sharma K, White E, Bunce C, Garway-Heath D.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul;89(7):851-4.PMID: 15965165 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen.

    Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, Hamilton R, Dave D, Dua HS.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 May;43(5):1389-92.PMID: 11980851 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology.

    Browning AC, Bhan A, Rotchford AP, Shah S, Dua HS.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Nov;88(11):1395-9.PMID: 15489480 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.

    Nakamura M, Darhad U, Tatsumi Y, Fujioka M, Kusuhara A, Maeda H, Negi A.

    Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Aug;142(2):332-4.PMID: 16876523 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy: a comparison of three different tonometers.

    Garzozi HJ, Chung HS, Lang Y, Kagemann L, Harris A.

    Cornea. 2001 Jan;20(1):33-6.PMID: 11189000 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Tono-Pen versus Goldmann tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.

    Levy Y, Zadok D, Glovinsky Y, Krakowski D, Nemet P.

    J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Apr;25(4):486-91.PMID: 10198852 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.

    Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Dec;89(12):1572-5.PMID: 16299132 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Inter-instrument agreement and influence of central corneal thickness on measurements with Goldmann, pneumotonometer and noncontact tonometer in glaucomatous eyes.

    Gupta V, Sony P, Agarwal HC, Sihota R, Sharma A.

    Indian J Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;54(4):261-5.PMID: 17090879 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    [Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer]

    Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Detry MB, Ledoux A, Pourjavan S.

    J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007 Mar;30(3):260-70. French. PMID: 17417152 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    [Measurement of intraocular pressure using the Tono-Pen in comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study in 100 eyes]

    Deuter CM, Schlote T, Hahn GA, Bende T, Derse M.

    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2002 Mar;219(3):138-42. German. PMID: 11987041 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Comparison of the Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.

    Horowitz GS, Byles J, Lee J, D'Este C.

    Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2004 Dec;32(6):584-9.PMID: 15575828 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Clinical comparison of ocular blood flow tonometer, Tonopen, and Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in postkeratoplasty eyes.

    Rao VJ, Gnanaraj L, Mitchell KW, Figueiredo FC.

    Cornea. 2001 Nov;20(8):834-8.PMID: 11685061 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.

    Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3118-21.PMID: 15326129 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Clinical comparison of the ocular blood flow tonograph and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.

    Esgin H, Alimgil ML, Erda S.

    Eur J Ophthalmol. 1998 Jul-Sep;8(3):162-6.PMID: 9793770 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.

    Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Brusini P.

    Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 May;85(3):272-9.PMID: 17488456 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    [Clinical evaluation of the dynamic rebound tonometer Icare]

    Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Detry MB, Pourjavan S, Charlier L, Dethinne B, Huge L, Ledoux A.

    J Fr Ophtalmol. 2006 Dec;29(10):1119-27. French. PMID: 17211320 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    Comparison of rebound and applanation tonometry in the management of patients treated for glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

    Rehnman JB, Martin L.

    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 Jul;28(4):382-6.PMID: 18565094 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry.

    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, Garcia-Sanchez J.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;46(12):4578-80.PMID: 16303951 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data