My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 264

    1.

    A qualitative study of why general practitioners may participate in significant event analysis and educational peer assessment.

    Bowie P, McKay J, Dalgetty E, Lough M.

    Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Jun;14(3):185-9.PMID: 15933315 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Awareness and analysis of a significant event by general practitioners: a cross sectional survey.

    Bowie P, McKay J, Norrie J, Lough M.

    Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Apr;13(2):102-7.PMID: 15069216 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Levels of agreement on the grading, analysis and reporting of significant events by general practitioners: a cross-sectional study.

    McKay J, Bowie P, Murray L, Lough M.

    Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Oct;17(5):339-45. Erratum in: Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18(1):80. PMID: 18842972 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.

    McKay J, Bowie P, Lough M.

    J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Dec;12(6):622-9.PMID: 17100861 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    A review of significant events analysed in general practice: implications for the quality and safety of patient care.

    McKay J, Bradley N, Lough M, Bowie P.

    BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Sep 1;10:61.PMID: 19723325 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    General practitioners' attitudes towards research in primary care: qualitative results of a cross sectional study.

    Rosemann T, Szecsenyi J.

    BMC Fam Pract. 2004 Dec 21;5(1):31.PMID: 15613246 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    The peer review pilot project: a potential system to support GP appraisal in NHS Scotland?

    Murie J, McCrae J, Bowie P.

    Educ Prim Care. 2009 Jan;20(1):34-40.PMID: 19618650 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Problem-based, peer-facilitated education about antibiotic prescribing.

    Morrison J, Johnson N, McConnachie A, Power A, Redding P, Corcoran D.

    Scott Med J. 2005 Aug;50(3):118-21.PMID: 16163998 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    External feedback in general practice: a focus group study of trained peer reviewers of significant event analyses.

    McKay J, Pope L, Bowie P, Lough M.

    J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;15(1):142-7.PMID: 19239594 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Learners' experience of continuing medical education events: a qualitative study of GP principals in Dorset.

    Campion-Smith C, Smith H, White P, Baker E, Baker R, Holloway I.

    Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Sep;48(434):1590-3.PMID: 9830185 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    Acceptability and educational impact of a peer feedback model for significant event analysis.

    McKay J, Shepherd A, Bowie P, Lough M.

    Med Educ. 2008 Dec;42(12):1210-7.PMID: 19120952 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Outreach visits to improve dementia care in general practice: a qualitative study.

    Dalsgaard T, Kallerup H, Rosendal M.

    Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Oct;19(5):267-73. Epub 2007 Aug 10.PMID: 17693445 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    Development and testing of an assessment instrument for the formative peer review of significant event analyses.

    McKay J, Murphy DJ, Bowie P, Schmuck ML, Lough M, Eva KW.

    Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr;16(2):150-3.PMID: 17403765 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    General practitioners' perceptions and attitudes to infertility management in primary care: focus group study.

    Wilkes S, Hall N, Crosland A, Murdoch A, Rubin G.

    J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Jun;13(3):358-63.PMID: 17518799 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study.

    Freeman AC, Sweeney K.

    BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1100-2.PMID: 11701576 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Significant event audit in practice: a preliminary study.

    Westcott R, Sweeney G, Stead J.

    Fam Pract. 2000 Apr;17(2):173-9.PMID: 10758082 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Verifying appraisal evidence using feedback from trained peers: views and experiences of Scottish GP appraisers.

    Bowie P, Cameron N, Staples I, McMillan R, McKay J, Lough M.

    Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Jul;59(564):484-9.PMID: 19566997 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Personal continuity and access in UK general practice: a qualitative study of general practitioners' and patients' perceptions of when and how they matter.

    Guthrie B, Wyke S.

    BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Feb 24;7:11.PMID: 16504130 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    Comparison of patients' and general practitioners' evaluations of general practice care.

    Jung HP, Wensing M, Olesen F, Grol R.

    Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):315-9.PMID: 12468690 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    General practitioners, revalidation and appraisal: a cross sectional survey of attitudes, beliefs and concerns in Lincolnshire.

    Middlemass J, Siriwardena AN.

    Med Educ. 2003 Sep;37(9):778-85.PMID: 12950940 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity