Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 148

    1.

    Author! Author!

    Papalkar D, Francis IC.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Apr;89(4):518-9. No abstract available. PMID: 15774936 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    What we owe the author: rethinking editorial peer review.

    Crigger NJ.

    Nurs Ethics. 1998 Sep;5(5):451-8. Review.PMID: 9782929 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    [Lessons learned from the coxibs' ups and downs. The journals must be tougher against referees and authors]

    Milerad J.

    Lakartidningen. 2008 May 21-27;105(21):1560-1. Swedish. No abstract available. PMID: 18574991 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted?

    Pravinkumar E.

    Lancet. 2003 Aug 30;362(9385):747. No abstract available. PMID: 12957106 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.

    Schroter S, Tite L, Hutchings A, Black N.

    JAMA. 2006 Jan 18;295(3):314-7.PMID: 16418467 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    What do we know about peer review?

    Wessely S.

    Psychol Med. 1996 Sep;26(5):883-6. No abstract available. PMID: 8878322 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Concerns about authorship and bias in scientific publications.

    Moser M.

    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006 Sep;8(9):613-4. No abstract available. PMID: 16957421 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    [Authorship and co-authorship]

    Haug C.

    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 Feb 9;126(4):429. Norwegian. No abstract available. PMID: 16477275 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Editorial policies and publication bias: the importance of negative studies.

    Sridharan L, Greenland P.

    Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jun 8;169(11):1022-3. No abstract available. PMID: 19506169 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Effects of differences between peer reviewers suggested by authors and by editors.

    Cummings P.

    JAMA. 2006 Sep 13;296(10):1231; author reply 1231-2. No abstract available. PMID: 16968843 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Open peer review: a first step.

    Dougherty MC.

    Nurs Res. 2004 Jul-Aug;53(4):213. No abstract available. PMID: 15266157 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    [Debate on peer review. Report from an international congress on peer review]

    Grimby G.

    Lakartidningen. 2002 Jul 25;99(30-31):3109-10. Swedish. No abstract available. PMID: 12198929 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Editorial.

    van Hemmen JL.

    Biol Cybern. 2006 Jan;94(1):1. No abstract available. PMID: 16365742 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Medical journals turn gaze inward to examine process of peer review.

    Stephenson J.

    JAMA. 1997 Nov 5;278(17):1389-91. No abstract available. PMID: 9355982 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    The manuscript review process.

    Triadafilopoulos G.

    Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Dec;64(6 Suppl):S23-5. No abstract available. PMID: 17113850 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative]

    Werkö L.

    Lakartidningen. 2006 Oct 25-31;103(43):3288-91. Swedish. No abstract available. PMID: 17117661 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Peer review: the best of the blemished?

    Alpert JS.

    Am J Med. 2007 Apr;120(4):287-8. No abstract available. PMID: 17398217 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Suggesting reviewers.

    Carmichael SW, Agur AM, Seifert MF, Spinner RJ, Tubbs RS, McDonald S, Nicholson H, Lachman N.

    Clin Anat. 2006 Jan;19(1):1. No abstract available. PMID: 16342266 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.

    Rivara FP, Cummings P, Ringold S, Bergman AB, Joffe A, Christakis DA.

    J Pediatr. 2007 Aug;151(2):202-5.PMID: 17643779 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Peer review. Suggesting or excluding reviewers can help get your paper published.

    Grimm D.

    Science. 2005 Sep 23;309(5743):1974. No abstract available. PMID: 16179438 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data