My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 169

    1.

    Simple nomograms to calculate sample size in diagnostic studies.

    Carley S, Dosman S, Jones SR, Harrison M.

    Emerg Med J. 2005 Mar;22(3):180-1. Erratum in: Emerg Med J. 2005 May;22(5):392. PMID: 15735264 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey.

    Bachmann LM, Puhan MA, ter Riet G, Bossuyt PM.

    BMJ. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1127-9. Epub 2006 Apr 20. Review.PMID: 16627488 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    [Evaluation of diagnostic methods]

    Doyon F, Hill C.

    J Radiol. 2001 Feb;82(2):117-25. Review. French. PMID: 11428206 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Modified exact sample size for a binomial proportion with special emphasis on diagnostic test parameter estimation.

    Fosgate GT.

    Stat Med. 2005 Sep 30;24(18):2857-66.PMID: 16134167 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies.

    Flahault A, Cadilhac M, Thomas G.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Aug;58(8):859-62.PMID: 16018921 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    [Sample size determination in reference-controlled diagnostic trials]

    Krummenauer F, Kauczor HU.

    Rofo. 2002 Nov;174(11):1438-44. German. PMID: 12424672 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies.

    Li J, Fine J.

    Stat Med. 2004 Aug 30;23(16):2537-50.PMID: 15287083 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity.

    Buderer NM.

    Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Sep;3(9):895-900. Review.PMID: 8870764 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.

    Martin JL, Williams KS, Abrams KR, Turner DA, Sutton AJ, Chapple C, Assassa RP, Shaw C, Cheater F.

    Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(6):1-132, iii-iv. Review.PMID: 16487456 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies.

    Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(8):763-70.PMID: 1941027 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Sample size for diagnostic accuracy studies.

    Salmi LR, Michel P.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):869-70; author reply 871-2. No abstract available. PMID: 15485744 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Incorporating the sampling variation of the disease prevalence when calculating the sample size in a study to determine the diagnostic accuracy of a test.

    Yi Q, Panzarella T, Corey P.

    Control Clin Trials. 2004 Aug;25(4):417-27.PMID: 15296816 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis.

    Maceneaney PM, Malone DE.

    Clin Radiol. 2000 Mar;55(3):227-35.PMID: 10708618 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Statistical methods in epidemiology. II: A commonsense approach to sample size estimation.

    Rigby AS, Vail A.

    Disabil Rehabil. 1998 Nov;20(11):405-10. Review.PMID: 9846240 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard test.

    Dendukuri N, Rahme E, Bélisle P, Joseph L.

    Biometrics. 2004 Jun;60(2):388-97.PMID: 15180664 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    [Roaming through methodology. X. The testing of diagnostic procedures]

    Bossuyt PM, Lijmer JG, Mol BW.

    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Oct 24;142(43):2345-7. Review. Dutch. PMID: 9864513 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Collaborative development of an insulin nomogram for intensive insulin therapy.

    Fraser DD, Robley LR, Ballard NM, Peno-Green LA.

    Crit Care Nurs Q. 2006 Jan-Mar;29(1):96-105.PMID: 16456368 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    The evaluation of diagnostic tests: evidence on technical and diagnostic accuracy, impact on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness is needed.

    Van den Bruel A, Cleemput I, Aertgeerts B, Ramaekers D, Buntinx F.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;60(11):1116-22. Epub 2007 Aug 29. Review.PMID: 17938052 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Improving the quality and clinical relevance of diagnostic studies.

    Rutten FH, Moons KG, Hoes AW.

    BMJ. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1129. No abstract available. PMID: 16690669 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    [Nomograms for the improvement of refractive outcomes]

    Mrochen M, Hafezi F, Iseli HP, Löffler J, Seiler T.

    Ophthalmologe. 2006 Apr;103(4):331-8. German. PMID: 16421709 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity