Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 241

    1.

    Interpreting the multifocal visual evoked potential: the effects of refractive errors, cataracts, and fixation errors.

    Winn BJ, Shin E, Odel JG, Greenstein VC, Hood DC.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar;89(3):340-4.PMID: 15722316 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    The influence of defocus on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

    Pieh C, Hoffmann MB, Bach M.

    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;243(1):38-42. Epub 2004 Sep 10.PMID: 15660277 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Stereoscopic evoked responses to crossed and uncrossed disparity accompanying simulated refractive error.

    Neill RA, Dunlop P, Dunlop DB, Fenelon B, Dunlop C.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 1988 Oct;72(10):759-63.PMID: 3191078 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: a monocular analysis.

    Hood DC, Ohri N, Yang EB, Rodarte C, Zhang X, Fortune B, Johnson CA.

    Doc Ophthalmol. 2004 Sep;109(2):189-99.PMID: 15881265 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    The effects of optic disc drusen on the latency of the pattern-reversal checkerboard and multifocal visual evoked potentials.

    Grippo TM, Ezon I, Kanadani FN, Wangsupadilok B, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Hood DC.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Sep;50(9):4199-204. Epub 2009 Jan 31.PMID: 19182248 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique.

    Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Chu DH, Xu L, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Hood DC.

    J Glaucoma. 2006 Aug;15(4):321-7.PMID: 16865010 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Postural stability changes in the elderly with cataract simulation and refractive blur.

    Anand V, Buckley JG, Scally A, Elliott DB.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Nov;44(11):4670-5.PMID: 14578384 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Pattern-reversal electroretinograms in squint amblyopia, artificial anisometropia and simulated eccentric fixation.

    Persson HE, Wanger P.

    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1982 Feb;60(1):123-32.PMID: 7136523 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Wavefront analysis of eyes with cataracts in patients with monocular triplopia.

    Kim A, Bessho K, Okawa Y, Maeda N, Tano Y, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Fujikado T.

    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Jan;26(1):65-70.PMID: 16390484 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    The effect of fixation instability on the multifocal VEP.

    Menz M, Sutter E, Menz M.

    Doc Ophthalmol. 2004 Sep;109(2):147-56.PMID: 15881260 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Effects of fixation instability on multifocal VEP (mfVEP) responses in amblyopes.

    Zhang B, Stevenson SS, Cheng H, Laron M, Kumar G, Tong J, Chino YM.

    J Vis. 2008 Mar 19;8(3):16.1-14.PMID: 18484822 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    Simulated nystagmus reduces pattern-reversal more strongly than pattern-onset multifocal visual evoked potentials.

    Hoffmann MB, Seufert PS.

    Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Jul;116(7):1723-32.PMID: 15908272 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    The multifocal visual evoked potential: an objective measure of visual fields?

    Seiple W, Holopigian K, Clemens C, Greenstein VC, Hood DC.

    Vision Res. 2005 Apr;45(9):1155-63. Epub 2004 Dec 19.PMID: 15707924 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Dichoptic stimulation improves detection of glaucoma with multifocal visual evoked potentials.

    Arvind H, Klistorner A, Graham S, Grigg J, Goldberg I, Klistorner A, Billson FA.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Oct;48(10):4590-6.PMID: 17898282 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    The detection of small relative simulated field defects using multifocal VEPs.

    Chan HL, Chu HW, Ng YF, Tam WK, Young SM, Lam CH, Cheung AL.

    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005 May;25(3):224-32.PMID: 15854069 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.

    Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;48(3):1173-80.PMID: 17325161 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Visual acuity tolerance to residual refractive errors in patients with an apodized diffractive intraocular lens.

    Fernández-Vega L, Alfonso JF, Montés-Micó R, Amhaz H.

    J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):199-204.PMID: 18242440 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    The detection of small simulated field defects using multifocal VEPs.

    Chan HL, Tam WK, Chen CL, Ng NC.

    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003 May;23(3):205-12.PMID: 12753476 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    The multifocal visual evoked potential.

    Hood DC, Odel JG, Winn BJ.

    J Neuroophthalmol. 2003 Dec;23(4):279-89. Review.PMID: 14663311 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Multifocal visual evoked potential and automated perimetry abnormalities in strabismic amblyopes.

    Greenstein VC, Eggers HM, Hood DC.

    J AAPOS. 2008 Feb;12(1):11-7. Epub 2007 Jul 24.PMID: 17651996 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data