Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 202

    1.

    Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials.

    Saghaei M.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 Nov 9;4:26.PMID: 15535880 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.

    Randelli P, Arrigoni P, Lubowitz JH, Cabitza P, Denti M.

    Arthroscopy. 2008 Jul;24(7):834-8. Epub 2008 Mar 21. Review.PMID: 18589273 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials.

    Robinson EJ, Kerr CE, Stevens AJ, Lilford RJ, Braunholtz DA, Edwards SJ, Beck SR, Rowley MG.

    Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(8):1-192, iii-iv.PMID: 15763039 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Balance algorithm for cluster randomized trials.

    Carter BR, Hood K.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Oct 9;8:65.PMID: 18844993 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).

    Brown DC.

    J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 Sep 15;229(6):990-3.PMID: 16978121 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    An R package for single-case randomization tests.

    Bulté I, Onghena P.

    Behav Res Methods. 2008 May;40(2):467-78.PMID: 18522057 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    Covariate-based constrained randomization of group-randomized trials.

    Moulton LH.

    Clin Trials. 2004;1(3):297-305.PMID: 16279255 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    A flexible random allocation program for multi-institutional clinical trials.

    Odaka T, Akazawa K, Watanabe Y, Nose Y, Ogura H.

    J Med Syst. 1994 Feb;18(1):39-53.PMID: 8064207 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Eliminating bias in randomized cluster trials with correlated binomial outcomes.

    Reed JF.

    Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2000 Feb;61(2):119-23.PMID: 10661397 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    The journal impact factor as a predictor of trial quality and outcomes: cohort study of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials.

    Gluud LL, Sørensen TI, Gøtzsche PC, Gluud C.

    Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;100(11):2431-5.PMID: 16279896 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Group sequential methods for cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.

    Zou GY, Donner A, Klar N.

    Clin Trials. 2005;2(6):479-87.PMID: 16422308 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Randomized clinical trials: alternatives to conventional randomization.

    Moser M.

    Am J Emerg Med. 1986 May;4(3):276-85.PMID: 3964374 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.

    Schouten HJ.

    Biometrics. 1995 Dec;51(4):1529-35.PMID: 8589238 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.

    Hofmeijer J, Anema PC, van der Tweel I.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):119-24. Epub 2007 Aug 23.PMID: 18177784 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.

    Viera AJ, Bangdiwala SI.

    Fam Med. 2007 Feb;39(2):132-7.PMID: 17273956 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Practical aspects of randomization and blinding in randomized clinical trials.

    Bridgman S, Engebretsen L, Dainty K, Kirkley A, Maffulli N; ISAKOS Scientific Committee.

    Arthroscopy. 2003 Nov;19(9):1000-6. Erratum in: Arthroscopy. 2004 Mar;20(3):A14. PMID: 14608321 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers.

    Doig GS, Simpson F.

    J Crit Care. 2005 Jun;20(2):187-91; discussion 191-3.PMID: 16139163 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.

    Hagino A, Hamada C, Yoshimura I, Ohashi Y, Sakamoto J, Nakazato H.

    Control Clin Trials. 2004 Dec;25(6):572-84.PMID: 15588744 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    A generic minimization random allocation and blinding system on web.

    Cai H, Xia J, Xu D, Gao D, Yan Y.

    J Biomed Inform. 2006 Dec;39(6):706-19. Epub 2006 Feb 28.PMID: 16616696 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Direct effect on validity of response run-in selection in clinical trials.

    Berger VW, Rezvani A, Makarewicz VA.

    Control Clin Trials. 2003 Apr;24(2):156-66.PMID: 12689737 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Display Settings:

    Format
    Items per page
    Sort by

    Send to:

    Choose Destination

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data