Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 797

    1.

    Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis.

    Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, Maki JH, Leiner T, Beek FJ, Korst MB, Flobbe K, de Haan MW, van Zwam WH, Postma CT, Hunink MG, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JM; Renal Artery Diagnostic Imaging Study in Hypertension (RADISH) Study Group.

    Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 2;141(9):674-82; discussion 682.PMID: 15520423 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.

    Rountas C, Vlychou M, Vassiou K, Liakopoulos V, Kapsalaki E, Koukoulis G, Fezoulidis IV, Stefanidis I.

    Ren Fail. 2007;29(3):295-302.PMID: 17497443 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Multidetector-row CT angiography of renal artery stenosis in 50 consecutive patients: prospective interobserver comparison with DSA.

    Fraioli F, Catalano C, Bertoletti L, Danti M, Fanelli F, Napoli A, Cavacece M, Passariello R.

    Radiol Med. 2006 Apr;111(3):459-68. Epub 2006 Apr 11. English, Italian. PMID: 16683091 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Renal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA.

    Stacul F, Gava S, Belgrano M, Cernic S, Pagnan L, Pozzi Mucelli F, Cova MA.

    Radiol Med. 2008 Jun;113(4):529-46. Epub 2008 May 15. English, Italian. PMID: 18480971 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Summaries for patients. Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

    [No authors listed]

    Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 2;141(9):I66. No abstract available. PMID: 15520418 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA.

    Soulez G, Pasowicz M, Benea G, Grazioli L, Niedmann JP, Konopka M, Douek PC, Morana G, Schaefer FK, Vanzulli A, Bluemke DA, Maki JH, Prince MR, Schneider G, Ballarati C, Coulden R, Wasser MN, McCauley TR, Kirchin MA, Pirovano G.

    Radiology. 2008 Apr;247(1):273-85. Epub 2008 Feb 7.PMID: 18372471 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    Noninvasive investigation for renal artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and color Doppler sonography as compared to digital subtraction angiography.

    Voiculescu A, Hofer M, Hetzel GR, Malms J, Mödder U, Grabensee B, Hollenbeck M.

    Clin Exp Hypertens. 2001 Oct;23(7):521-31.PMID: 11710754 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    The limitations of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: comparative analysis with conventional arteriography.

    Patel ST, Mills JL Sr, Tynan-Cuisinier G, Goshima KR, Westerband A, Hughes JD.

    J Vasc Surg. 2005 Mar;41(3):462-8.PMID: 15838481 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in renal artery stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

    Law YM, Tay KH, Gan YU, Cheah FK, Tan BS.

    Hong Kong Med J. 2008 Apr;14(2):136-41.PMID: 18382021 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Diagnosis and outcome of renal function in patients with renal artery stenosis: which role have color Doppler sonography and magnetic resonance angiography?

    Cianci R, Coen G, Manfredini P, Ciano G, Di Donato D, Stivali G, Bianco P, Vitale M, Lavini R.

    Minerva Cardioangiol. 2006 Feb;54(1):139-44.PMID: 16467748 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study.

    Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Londy F, Krishnan S, Zuna I, Lang N, Essig M, Hawighorst H, Maki JH, Stafford-Johnson D, Kallinowski F, Chenevert TL, Prince MR.

    J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 Jan;13(1):158-69.PMID: 11752033 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    Review of source images is necessary for the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for renal artery stenosis.

    Wehrschuetz M, Aschauer M, Portugaller H, Stix A, Wehrschuetz-Sigl E, Hausegger K, Ebner F.

    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2004 Sep-Oct;27(5):441-6. Epub 2004 Jun 16.PMID: 15383846 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.

    Schneider G, Ballarati C, Grazioli L, Manfredi R, Thurnher S, Kroencke TJ, Taupitz M, Merlino B, Bonomo L, Shen N, Pirovano G, Kirchin MA, Spinazzi A.

    J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Oct;26(4):1020-32.PMID: 17896354 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability.

    Völk M, Strotzer M, Lenhart M, Manke C, Nitz WR, Seitz J, Feuerbach S, Link J.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jun;174(6):1583-8.PMID: 10845486 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy.

    Patel SG, Collie DA, Wardlaw JM, Lewis SC, Wright AR, Gibson RJ, Sellar RJ.

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;73(1):21-8.PMID: 12082040 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Spiral computed tomographic angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with intravenous and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.

    Farrés MT, Lammer J, Schima W, Wagner B, Wildling R, Winkelbauer F, Thurnher S.

    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1996 Mar-Apr;19(2):101-6.PMID: 8662167 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Comparison of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation on allograft renal artery stenosis.

    Chan YL, Leung CB, Yu SC, Yeung DK, Li PK.

    Clin Radiol. 2001 Feb;56(2):127-32.PMID: 11222071 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Cost analysis of procedures related to the management of renal artery stenosis from various perspectives.

    van Helvoort-Postulart D, Dirksen CD, Kroon AA, Nelemans PJ, de Leeuw PW, Kessels AG, van Engelshoven JM, Myriam Hunink MG.

    Eur Radiol. 2006 Jan;16(1):154-60. Epub 2005 Jul 5.PMID: 15997367 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Renal artery stenosis: detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography.

    Kaatee R, Beek FJ, de Lange EE, van Leeuwen MS, Smits HF, van der Ven PJ, Beutler JJ, Mali WP.

    Radiology. 1997 Oct;205(1):121-7.PMID: 9314973 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Accuracy of semiautomated analysis of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for detection and quantification of aortoiliac stenoses.

    de Vries M, de Koning PJ, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Nelemans PJ, Nijenhuis RJ, Planken RN, Vasbinder GB, van Engelshoven JM, van der Geest RJ, Leiner T.

    Invest Radiol. 2005 Aug;40(8):495-503.PMID: 16024987 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data