My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 241

    1.

    Development of a clinically feasible logMAR alternative to the Snellen chart: performance of the "compact reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart in amblyopic children.

    Laidlaw DA, Abbott A, Rosser DA.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Oct;87(10):1232-4.PMID: 14507755 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.

    Laidlaw DA, Tailor V, Shah N, Atamian S, Harcourt C.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;92(2):241-4. Epub 2007 Nov 9.PMID: 17993577 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    The development of a "reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice.

    Rosser DA, Laidlaw DA, Murdoch IE.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Apr;85(4):432-6.PMID: 11264133 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Comparison of the ETDRS logMAR, 'compact reduced logMar' and Snellen charts in routine clinical practice.

    Lim LA, Frost NA, Powell RJ, Hewson P.

    Eye (Lond). 2009 Jun 26. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 19557025 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]Related articles

    5.

    The repeatability of best corrected acuity in normal and amblyopic children 4 to 12 years of age.

    Chen SI, Chandna A, Norcia AM, Pettet M, Stone D.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Feb;47(2):614-9.PMID: 16431958 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.

    Rosser DA, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DA.

    Eye (Lond). 2003 Aug;17(6):701-6.PMID: 12928680 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.

    Rice ML, Leske DA, Holmes JM.

    Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb;137(2):278-82.PMID: 14962417 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.

    Beck RW, Moke PS, Turpin AH, Ferris FL 3rd, SanGiovanni JP, Johnson CA, Birch EE, Chandler DL, Cox TA, Blair RC, Kraker RT.

    Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Feb;135(2):194-205.PMID: 12566024 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Comparison of logMAR ETDRS chart and a new computerised staircased procedure for assessment of the visual acuity of children.

    Stewart CE, Hussey A, Davies N, Moseley MJ.

    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Nov;26(6):597-601.PMID: 17040424 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity assessment in population-based surveys.

    Bourne RR, Rosser DA, Sukudom P, Dineen B, Laidlaw DA, Johnson GJ, Murdoch IE.

    Eye (Lond). 2003 Aug;17(6):754-8.PMID: 12928690 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    The Thai logarithmic visual acuity chart.

    Ruamviboonsuk P, Tiensuwan M.

    J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Jun;85(6):673-81.PMID: 12322840 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Comparison of visual acuity levels in pediatric patients with amblyopia using Wright figures, Allen optotypes, and Snellen letters.

    Mocan MC, Najera-Covarrubias M, Wright KW.

    J AAPOS. 2005 Feb;9(1):48-52.PMID: 15729280 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    How sensitive to clinical change are ETDRS logMAR visual acuity measurements?

    Rosser DA, Cousens SN, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DA.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Aug;44(8):3278-81.PMID: 12882770 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    14.

    Improving the reliability of visual acuity measures in young children.

    McGraw PV, Winn B, Gray LS, Elliott DB.

    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000 May;20(3):173-84.PMID: 10897339 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Screening for myopia and refractive errors using LogMAR visual acuity by optometrists and a simplified visual acuity chart by nurses.

    Tong L, Saw SM, Chan ES, Yap M, Lee HY, Kwang YP, Tan D.

    Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;81(9):684-91.PMID: 15365388 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Predicting potential acuities in amblyopes: predicting post-therapy acuity in amblyopes.

    Ridder WH 3rd, Rouse MW.

    Doc Ophthalmol. 2007 May;114(3):135-45. Epub 2007 Feb 20.PMID: 17310345 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Visual acuity tests using chart, line, and single optotype in healthy and amblyopic children.

    Morad Y, Werker E, Nemet P.

    J AAPOS. 1999 Apr;3(2):94-7.PMID: 10221802 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    A comparison of Lea Symbol vs ETDRS letter distance visual acuity in a population of young children with a high prevalence of astigmatism.

    Dobson V, Clifford-Donaldson CE, Miller JM, Garvey KA, Harvey EM.

    J AAPOS. 2009 Jun;13(3):253-7. Epub 2009 Apr 5.PMID: 19345596 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    The dependency of logMAR visual acuity measurements on chart design and scoring rule.

    Hazel CA, Elliott DB.

    Optom Vis Sci. 2002 Dec;79(12):788-92.PMID: 12512687 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    The accuracy of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.

    Felius J, Wang YZ, Birch EE.

    J AAPOS. 2003 Dec;7(6):406-12.PMID: 14730293 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity