Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 3778

    1.

    Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.

    Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung BM, Grady D.

    Ann Intern Med. 2003 Aug 19;139(4):274-84. Review.PMID: 12965983 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Interventional breast procedures.

    de Paredes ES, Langer TG, Cousins J.

    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5):133-84. Review.PMID: 9794095 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.

    Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ, Gatsonis CA, Berg WA, Connolly J, Schnitt S, Page DL, McNeil BJ; Radiologist Investigators of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V.

    Acad Radiol. 2004 Mar;11(3):293-308.PMID: 15035520 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?

    Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH, Hopf G, Morgun M, Graf C, Mallek R, Sickles EA.

    Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):850-6. Epub 2004 Oct 14.PMID: 15486217 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer.

    Steinberg JL, Trudeau ME, Ryder DE, Fishell E, Chapman JA, McCready DR, Fish EB, Hiraki GY, Ross TM, Lickley LA.

    Can J Surg. 1996 Aug;39(4):302-11. Erratum in: Can J Surg 1997 Feb;40(1):9. PMID: 8697321 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation.

    Ariga R, Bloom K, Reddy VB, Kluskens L, Francescatti D, Dowlat K, Siziopikou P, Gattuso P.

    Am J Surg. 2002 Nov;184(5):410-3.PMID: 12433603 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Use of fine needle aspiration for solid breast lesions is accurate and cost-effective.

    Rubin M, Horiuchi K, Joy N, Haun W, Read R, Ratzer E, Fenoglio M.

    Am J Surg. 1997 Dec;174(6):694-6; discussion 697-8.PMID: 9409599 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Breast fine needle aspiration cytology. Utility as a screening tool for clinically palpable lesions.

    Costa MJ, Tadros T, Hilton G, Birdsong G.

    Acta Cytol. 1993 Jul-Aug;37(4):461-71.PMID: 8328240 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Solid nonpalpable breast lesions. Success and failure of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases.

    Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Ambrogetti D, Bravetti P, Catarzi S, Morrone D, Cariaggi MP.

    Acta Radiol. 1997 Sep;38(5):815-20.PMID: 9332236 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred?

    Park YM, Kim EK, Lee JH, Ryu JH, Han SS, Choi SJ, Lee SJ, Yoon HK.

    Acta Radiol. 2008 Dec;49(10):1104-11.PMID: 18855166 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.

    Hindle WH, Chen EC.

    Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2.PMID: 9215186 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Clinical management of nonpalpable or small breast masses by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) under ultrasound guidance.

    Okamoto H, Ogawara T, Inoue S, Kobayashi K, Sekikawa T, Matsumoto Y.

    J Surg Oncol. 1998 Apr;67(4):246-50.PMID: 9579372 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions: controversies and future prospects.

    Lifrange E, Kridelka F, Colin C.

    Eur J Radiol. 1997 Jan;24(1):39-47.PMID: 9056148 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    [Ultrasound follow-up of palpable solid, probably benign breast lesions (BI-RADS category III)]

    Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjäger MH, Hopf G, Morgun M, Graf C, Mallek R.

    Rofo. 2004 Sep;176(9):1251-6. German. PMID: 15346259 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review.

    Moy L, Slanetz PJ, Moore R, Satija S, Yeh ED, McCarthy KA, Hall D, Staffa M, Rafferty EA, Halpern E, Kopans DB.

    Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):176-81.PMID: 12355002 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    Underestimation of the presence of breast carcinoma in papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core-needle biopsy.

    Sydnor MK, Wilson JD, Hijaz TA, Massey HD, Shaw de Paredes ES.

    Radiology. 2007 Jan;242(1):58-62. Epub 2006 Nov 7.PMID: 17090707 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    Solid breast lesions: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

    Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL, Chan NH.

    Radiology. 1993 Nov;189(2):573-80.PMID: 8210392 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Costs and effects of ultrasonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses.

    Flobbe K, Kessels AG, Severens JL, Beets GL, de Koning HJ, von Meyenfeld MF, van Engelshoven JM.

    Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Fall;20(4):440-8.PMID: 15609793 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data