Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 136

    1.

    Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods.

    Viswanathan AC, Crabb DP, McNaught AI, Westcott MC, Kamal D, Garway-Heath DF, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun;87(6):726-30.PMID: 12770970 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of PROGRESSOR and STATPAC 2.

    Viswanathan AC, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Dec;81(12):1037-42.PMID: 9497460 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Visual field progression: comparison of Humphrey Statpac2 and pointwise linear regression analysis.

    McNaught AI, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA.

    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996 Jul;234(7):411-8.PMID: 8817283 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.

    Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996 Jun;37(7):1419-28.PMID: 8641844 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Comparison of methods to detect visual field progression in glaucoma .

    Nouri-Mahdavi K, Brigatti L, Weitzman M, Caprioli J.

    Ophthalmology. 1997 Aug;104(8):1228-36. Erratum in: Ophthalmology 1998 Jan;105(1):7. PMID: 9261308 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Improving the prediction of visual field progression in glaucoma using spatial processing.

    Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, McNaught AI, Edgar DF, Hitchings RA.

    Ophthalmology. 1997 Mar;104(3):517-24.PMID: 9082283 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Comparison of visual field progression in patients with normal pressure glaucoma between eyes with and without visual field loss that threatens fixation.

    Membrey WL, Poinoosawmy DP, Bunce C, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Oct;84(10):1154-8.PMID: 11004102 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Determining progressive visual field loss in serial Humphrey visual fields.

    Birch MK, Wishart PK, O'Donnell NP.

    Ophthalmology. 1995 Aug;102(8):1227-34; discussion 1234-5.PMID: 9097752 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.

    Artes PH, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;46(12):4600-6.PMID: 16303955 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    Detection of visual-field deterioration by Glaucoma Progression Analysis and Threshold Noiseless Trend programs.

    Diaz-Aleman VT, Anton A, de la Rosa MG, Johnson ZK, McLeod S, Azuara-Blanco A.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;93(3):322-8. Epub 2008 Jul 11.PMID: 18621790 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Pointwise univariate linear regression of perimetric sensitivity against follow-up time in glaucoma.

    Wild JM, Hutchings N, Hussey MK, Flanagan JG, Trope GE.

    Ophthalmology. 1997 May;104(5):808-15.PMID: 9160027 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Spatial and temporal processing of threshold data for detection of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss.

    Spry PG, Johnson CA, Bates AB, Turpin A, Chauhan BC.

    Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;120(2):173-80.PMID: 11831919 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Pointwise linear regression for evaluation of visual field outcomes and comparison with the advanced glaucoma intervention study methods.

    Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J, Coleman AL, Hoffman D, Gaasterland D.

    Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb;123(2):193-9.PMID: 15710815 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.

    Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;46(7):2451-7.PMID: 15980235 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Modelling series of visual fields to detect progression in normal-tension glaucoma.

    McNaught AI, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA.

    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995 Dec;233(12):750-5.PMID: 8626082 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma.

    Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Nov;82(11):1236-41.PMID: 9924324 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma.

    Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Poinoosawmy D, McNaught AI, Crabb DP.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jan;80(1):40-8.PMID: 8664231 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    Pointwise linear regression analysis for detection of visual field progression with absolute versus corrected threshold sensitivities.

    Manassakorn A, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Koucheki B, Law SK, Caprioli J.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jul;47(7):2896-903.PMID: 16799031 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Unsupervised machine learning with independent component analysis to identify areas of progression in glaucomatous visual fields.

    Sample PA, Boden C, Zhang Z, Pascual J, Lee TW, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Crowston JG, Hoffmann EM, Medeiros FA, Sejnowski T, Goldbaum M.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Oct;46(10):3684-92.PMID: 16186350 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data