My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 191

    1.

    Competency in interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: a summary and appraisal of published evidence.

    Salerno SM, Alguire PC, Waxman HS.

    Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 6;138(9):751-60. Review.PMID: 12729431 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Training and competency evaluation for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: recommendations from the American College of Physicians.

    Salerno SM, Alguire PC, Waxman HS; American College of Physicians.

    Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 6;138(9):747-50.PMID: 12729430 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    The emergency department versus the computer: which is the better electrocardiographer?

    Snyder CS, Fenrich AL, Friedman RA, Macias C, O'Reilly K, Kertesz NJ.

    Pediatr Cardiol. 2003 Jul-Aug;24(4):364-8. Epub 2002 Dec 4.PMID: 12457259 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Comparison of electrocardiogram interpretations by family physicians, a computer, and a cardiology service.

    Woolley D, Henck M, Luck J.

    J Fam Pract. 1992 Apr;34(4):428-32.PMID: 1556536 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis.

    Anh D, Krishnan S, Bogun F.

    J Electrocardiol. 2006 Jul;39(3):343-5.PMID: 16777525 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Does a computer-based ECG-recorder interpret electrocardiograms more efficiently than physicians?

    Jakobsson A, Ohlin P, Pahlm O.

    Clin Physiol. 1985 Oct;5(5):417-23.PMID: 3902333 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Computer-aided systematized approach to pediatric ECG analysis.

    Molina MS, Benjo AM, Molina AI, Favarato D, Tobias N, Garcia Ede V, Ramires JA, Pastore CA.

    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2007 Jul;12(3):237-45.PMID: 17617069 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Analysis of emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms.

    Snoey ER, Housset B, Guyon P, ElHaddad S, Valty J, Hericord P.

    J Accid Emerg Med. 1994 Sep;11(3):149-53.PMID: 7804577 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation.

    Schijvenaars BJ, Kors JA, van Herpen G, van Bemmel JH.

    Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 1):513-7.PMID: 11604793 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.

    Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ.

    Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28. Review.PMID: 16147767 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm.

    Shah AP, Rubin SA.

    J Electrocardiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;40(5):385-90. Epub 2007 May 24.PMID: 17531257 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Effectiveness of continuing medical education.

    Marinopoulos SS, Dorman T, Ratanawongsa N, Wilson LM, Ashar BH, Magaziner JL, Miller RG, Thomas PA, Prokopowicz GP, Qayyum R, Bass EB.

    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Jan;(149):1-69. Review.PMID: 17764217 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    Observer variability in ECG interpretation for thrombolysis eligibility: experience and context matter.

    Massel D.

    J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2003 Jun;15(3):131-40.PMID: 14739622 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Diagnostic interpretation of electrocardiograms in population-based research: computer program research physicians, or cardiologists?

    de Bruyne MC, Kors JA, Hoes AW, Kruijssen DA, Deckers JW, Grosfeld M, van Herpen G, Grobbee DE, van Bemmel JH.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;50(8):947-52.PMID: 9291880 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Evaluation of ECG interpretation results obtained by computer and cardiologists.

    Willems JL, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P, Brohet CR, Denis B, Gehring J, Graham I, van Herpen G, Machado H, Michaelis J, et al.

    Methods Inf Med. 1990 Sep;29(4):308-16.PMID: 2233377 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    The effect of erroneous computer interpretation of ECGs on resident decision making.

    Southern WN, Arnsten JH.

    Med Decis Making. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):372-6. Epub 2009 May 21.PMID: 19470722 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?]

    Morisbak B, Gjesdal K.

    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999 Sep 30;119(23):3441-4. Norwegian. PMID: 10553343 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Potential benefits of a computer ECG interpretation system for primary care physicians in a community hospital.

    Grauer K, Kravitz L, Ariet M, Curry RW Jr, Nelson WP, Marriott HJ.

    J Am Board Fam Pract. 1989 Jan-Mar;2(1):17-24.PMID: 2646852 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation and its clinical consequences.

    Bogun F, Anh D, Kalahasty G, Wissner E, Bou Serhal C, Bazzi R, Weaver WD, Schuger C.

    Am J Med. 2004 Nov 1;117(9):636-42.PMID: 15501200 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.

    Willems JL, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P, van Bemmel JH, Brohet C, Degani R, Denis B, Gehring J, Graham I, van Herpen G, et al.

    N Engl J Med. 1991 Dec 19;325(25):1767-73.PMID: 1834940 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity