Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 128

    1.

    Effect of a patient training video on visual field test reliability.

    Sherafat H, Spry PG, Waldock A, Sparrow JM, Diamond JP.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Feb;87(2):153-6.PMID: 12543740 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Analysis of reliability indices from Humphrey visual field tests in an urban glaucoma population.

    Birt CM, Shin DH, Samudrala V, Hughes BA, Kim C, Lee D.

    Ophthalmology. 1997 Jul;104(7):1126-30.PMID: 9224465 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Effect of intermittent versus continuous patient monitoring on reliability indices during automated perimetry.

    Johnson LN, Aminlari A, Sassani JW.

    Ophthalmology. 1993 Jan;100(1):76-84.PMID: 8433832 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    The reliability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry in a pediatric population.

    Becker K, Semes L.

    Optometry. 2003 Mar;74(3):173-9.PMID: 12645850 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Reliability of the first eye and second eye in frequency doubling technology perimetry.

    Mukai S, Tsukamoto H, Iwase A, Mishima HK.

    Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep-Oct;49(5):417-9.PMID: 16187045 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Randomised controlled trial comparing the effect of brimonidine and timolol on visual field loss after acute primary angle closure.

    Aung T, Oen FT, Wong HT, Chan YH, Khoo BK, Liu YP, Ho CL, See J, Thean LH, Viswanathan AC, Seah SK, Chew PT.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;88(1):88-94.PMID: 14693782 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    Assessing the utility of reliability indices for automated visual fields. Testing ocular hypertensives.

    Bickler-Bluth M, Trick GL, Kolker AE, Cooper DG.

    Ophthalmology. 1989 May;96(5):616-9.PMID: 2748118 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Progression of visual field loss in untreated glaucoma patients and suspects in St Lucia, West Indies.

    Wilson MR.

    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100:365-410.PMID: 12545702 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Effect of eye testing order on automated perimetry results using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm standard 24-2.

    Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Mora R, Liebmann JM, Ritch R.

    Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Jun;124(6):781-4.PMID: 16769830 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Peristat: a computer-based perimetry self-test for cost-effective population screening of glaucoma.

    Ianchulev T, Pham P, Makarov V, Francis B, Minckler D.

    Curr Eye Res. 2005 Jan;30(1):1-6.PMID: 15875358 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    The use of semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) to monitor advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.

    Nevalainen J, Paetzold J, Krapp E, Vonthein R, Johnson CA, Schiefer U.

    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep;246(9):1331-9. Epub 2008 Jun 18.PMID: 18563431 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.

    Patel A, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Schuman JS.

    Ophthalmology. 2007 Mar;114(3):480-7. Epub 2006 Nov 21.PMID: 17123623 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    Continuous visual field test supervision may not always be necessary.

    Van Coevorden RE, Mills RP, Chen YY, Barnebey HS.

    Ophthalmology. 1999 Jan;106(1):178-81.PMID: 9917801 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Effect of laser spot diameter on the reproducibility of visual field analysis in diabetic patients with upper temporal retinal vein occlusion.

    Akar Y, Apaydin KC, Metinsoy M.

    Ophthalmologica. 2008;222(2):64-8. Epub 2008 Feb 22.PMID: 18303224 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.

    Artes PH, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;46(12):4600-6.PMID: 16303955 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    An educational video to increase clinical trials enrollment among lung cancer patients.

    Du W, Mood D, Gadgeel S, Simon MS.

    J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Jan;3(1):23-9.PMID: 18166837 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Learning effect of Humphrey Matrix perimetry.

    Hong S, Na K, Kim CY, Seong GJ.

    Can J Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct;42(5):707-11.PMID: 17823644 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    Driving performance of glaucoma patients correlates with peripheral visual field loss.

    Szlyk JP, Mahler CL, Seiple W, Edward DP, Wilensky JT.

    J Glaucoma. 2005 Apr;14(2):145-50.PMID: 15741817 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.

    Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Shirato S, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y; Tajimi Study Group.

    Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):27-32. Epub 2006 Oct 27.PMID: 17070580 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Humphrey visual field analysis, visual field defects, and ophthalmic findings in patients with macro pituitary adenoma.

    Gedik S, Gur S, Atalay B, Colak M, Altinors N, Akova YA.

    Saudi Med J. 2007 Sep;28(9):1380-4.PMID: 17768464 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data