Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 128

    1.

    Overview of research designs.

    Clancy MJ.

    Emerg Med J. 2002 Nov;19(6):546-9. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 12421782 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Research methodology.

    Dunn WR, Lyman S, Marx R; ISAKOS Scientific Committee.

    Arthroscopy. 2003 Oct;19(8):870-3. Review.PMID: 14551552 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    [Classification bias in epidemiological studies]

    Zieliński A.

    Przegl Epidemiol. 2008;62(2):461-70. Polish. PMID: 18807495 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Two-group experimental designs.

    Brink PJ.

    West J Nurs Res. 2003 Oct;25(6):619-22. No abstract available. PMID: 14528614 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Sources of error in clinical research.

    Kumar R, Kumar S.

    Indian Pediatr. 1996 Dec;33(12):1029-32. No abstract available. PMID: 9141804 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Analytical study designs--I.

    Lobo MA, Qureshi AF.

    J Pak Med Assoc. 1994 Feb;44(2):54-6. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 8040996 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Adjusting results for confounding bias.

    Ranstam J.

    Acta Radiol. 2008 Sep;49(7):769-70. No abstract available. PMID: 19143063 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Bias in research.

    Agabegi SS, Stern PJ.

    Am J Orthop. 2008 May;37(5):242-8.PMID: 18587501 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.

    Wunsch H, Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC.

    J Crit Care. 2006 Mar;21(1):1-7.PMID: 16616616 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Confounding and effect modification: their significance in medical research.

    Olayinka BA.

    Cent Afr J Med. 1997 Jan;43(1):27-8. No abstract available. PMID: 9185379 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Bias: adding to the uncertainty.

    Sparrow JM, Thompson JR.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;83(6):637-8. No abstract available. PMID: 10340965 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    Improving the evidence base in surgery: sources of bias in surgical studies.

    Young JM, Solomon MJ.

    ANZ J Surg. 2003 Jul;73(7):504-6.PMID: 12864825 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Reasons for caution when evaluating health care interventions using non-randomised study designs.

    Reeves BC.

    Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2004 Aug;11 Suppl 1:40-5.PMID: 15353902 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review.

    Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Sampson M, Fergusson D, Cogo E, Horsley T, Moher D.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):422-34. Review.PMID: 18394534 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Four different study designs to evaluate vaccine safety were equally validated with contrasting limitations.

    Glanz JM, McClure DL, Xu S, Hambidge SJ, Lee M, Kolczak MS, Kleinman K, Mullooly JP, France EK.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;59(8):808-18. Epub 2006 Mar 15.PMID: 16828674 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    A statistics primer.

    Greenfield ML, Kuhn JE, Wojtys EM.

    Am J Sports Med. 1996 May-Jun;24(3):393-5. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 8734894 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    [Use of nonparametric methods for controlling unseen confounding variables in ecological time-series studies]

    Figueiras A, Saez M, Tobias A.

    Gac Sanit. 1999 Sep-Oct;13(5):417-8. Spanish. No abstract available. PMID: 10681201 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    Methodologic challenges to studying patient safety and comparative effectiveness.

    Strom BL.

    Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S13-5.PMID: 17909371 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Interpretation of observational studies.

    Jepsen P, Johnsen SP, Gillman MW, Sørensen HT.

    Heart. 2004 Aug;90(8):956-60. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 15253985 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials?

    Vandenbroucke JP.

    Lancet. 2004 May 22;363(9422):1728-31. No abstract available. PMID: 15158638 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data