Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 416

    1.

    Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature.

    Honest H, Khan KS.

    BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2(1):4. Epub 2002 Mar 7.PMID: 11884248 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.

    Dinnes J, Deeks J, Kirby J, Roderick P.

    Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(12):1-113, iii. Review.PMID: 15774235 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Meta-analyses of studies of the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests: a review of the concepts and methods.

    Vamvakas EC.

    Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Aug;122(8):675-86.PMID: 9701328 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting.

    Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Halligan S, Hopewell S, Cornelius V, Altman DG.

    BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):413. Epub 2006 Jul 18. Review.PMID: 16849365 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.

    Engberg S.

    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008 May-Jun;35(3):258-65. Review.PMID: 18496080 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.

    Martin JL, Williams KS, Abrams KR, Turner DA, Sutton AJ, Chapple C, Assassa RP, Shaw C, Cheater F.

    Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(6):1-132, iii-iv. Review.PMID: 16487456 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.

    Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt PM; Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group.

    Ann Intern Med. 2008 Dec 16;149(12):889-97.PMID: 19075208 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy.

    Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):119-30; discussion 131-2. Review.PMID: 7853038 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.

    Dundar Y, Dodd S, Dickson R, Walley T, Haycox A, Williamson PR.

    Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. Review.PMID: 16487455 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Quality-assessed reviews of health care interventions and the database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness (DARE). NHS CRD Review, Dissemination, and Information Teams.

    Petticrew M, Song F, Wilson P, Wright K.

    Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Fall;15(4):671-8.PMID: 10645108 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Methodology and reporting quality of systematic review/meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine.

    Junhua Z, Hongcai S, Xiumei G, Boli Z, Yaozu X, Hongbo C, Ming R.

    J Altern Complement Med. 2007 Oct;13(8):797-805.PMID: 17983335 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools.

    Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Dinnes J, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jan;58(1):1-12. Review.PMID: 15649665 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data.

    Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jul 12;6:31.PMID: 16836745 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    14.

    Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.

    Song F, Khan KS, Dinnes J, Sutton AJ.

    Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):88-95.PMID: 11914301 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.

    Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, D'Amico R, Bradburn M, Eastwood AJ; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group.

    Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jul;9(26):1-134, iii-iv.PMID: 16014203 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis?

    Westwood ME, Whiting PF, Kleijnen J.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Jun 8;5(1):20. Review.PMID: 15943861 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects.

    Golder S, Loke Y, McIntosh HM.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):440-8. Epub 2007 Oct 22. Review.PMID: 18394536 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects.

    Golder S, Loke Y, McIntosh HM.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jan 27;6:3.PMID: 16441876 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    The science of systematic reviewing studies of diagnostic tests.

    Oosterhuis WP, Niessen RW, Bossuyt PM.

    Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000 Jul;38(7):577-88. Review.PMID: 11028761 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.

    Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;58(10):982-90. Review.PMID: 16168343 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Display Settings:

    Format
    Items per page
    Sort by

    Send to:

    Choose Destination