My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 134

    1.

    Evaluation of the validity and reliability of A-scan ultrasound biometry with a single use disposable cover.

    Cass K, Thompson CM, Tromans C, Wood IC.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Mar;86(3):344-9.PMID: 11864896 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry.

    Santodomingo-Rubido J, Mallen EA, Gilmartin B, Wolffsohn JS.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Apr;86(4):458-62.PMID: 11914218 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Cling film as a barrier against CJD in corneal contact A-scan ultrasonography.

    Rani A, Dunne MC, Barnes DA.

    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003 Jan;23(1):9-12.PMID: 12535051 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Comparison of corneal versus through-the-lid A-scan ultrasound biometry.

    Twelker JD, Kirschbaum S, Zadnik K, Mutti DO.

    Optom Vis Sci. 1997 Oct;74(10):852-8.PMID: 9383799 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Comparative estimation of anterior chamber depth by ultrasonography, Orbscan II, and IOLMaster.

    Reddy AR, Pande MV, Finn P, El-Gogary H.

    J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Jun;30(6):1268-71.PMID: 15177602 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Clinical assessment of the Zeiss IOLMaster.

    Kielhorn I, Rajan MS, Tesha PM, Subryan VR, Bell JA.

    J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Mar;29(3):518-22.PMID: 12663017 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients.

    Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Berrow EJ.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;93(7):949-53. Epub 2009 Apr 19.PMID: 19380310 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery.

    Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Sacu S, Kiss B, Polak K, Nepp J, Schild G, Rainer G, Maca S, Petternel V, Lackner B, Drexler W.

    J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Oct;29(10):1950-5.PMID: 14604716 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Effect of soft contact lenses on optical measurements of axial length and keratometry for biometry in eyes with corneal irregularities.

    Lewis JR, Knellinger AE, Mahmoud AM, Mauger TF.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Aug;49(8):3371-8. Epub 2008 Apr 25.PMID: 18441314 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Assessment and reproducibility of anterior chamber depth measurement with anterior segment optical coherence tomography compared with immersion ultrasonography.

    Nemeth G, Vajas A, Tsorbatzoglou A, Kolozsvari B, Modis L Jr, Berta A.

    J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Mar;33(3):443-7.PMID: 17321395 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Comparison of biometric measurements using partial coherence interferometry and applanation ultrasound.

    Tehrani M, Krummenauer F, Kumar R, Dick HB.

    J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Apr;29(4):747-52.PMID: 12686243 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation.

    Rose LT, Moshegov CN.

    Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2003 Apr;31(2):121-4.PMID: 12648044 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Contact versus immersion biometry of axial length before cataract surgery.

    Hennessy MP, Franzco, Chan DG.

    J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Nov;29(11):2195-8.PMID: 14670431 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Comparison of laser interferometry and ultrasound A-scan in the measurement of axial length.

    Goyal R, North RV, Morgan JE.

    Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003 Aug;81(4):331-5.PMID: 12859258 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound.

    Olsen T, Nielsen PJ.

    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1989 Feb;67(1):101-2.PMID: 2672694 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Graft central thickness measurement by rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry after penetrating keratoplasty.

    de Sanctis U, Missolungi A, Mutani B, Grignolo FM.

    Ophthalmology. 2007 Aug;114(8):1461-8.PMID: 17678690 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Microbial contamination of immersion biometry ultrasound equipment.

    Velázquez-Estades LJ, Wanger A, Kellaway J, Hardten DR, Prager TC.

    Ophthalmology. 2005 May;112(5):e13-8.PMID: 15878049 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymetry, konan noncontact optical pachymetry, and orbscan pachymetry.

    Christensen A, Narváez J, Zimmerman G.

    Cornea. 2008 Sep;27(8):862-5.PMID: 18724143 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Corneal radii and anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLmaster versus the Pentacam.

    Reuland MS, Reuland AJ, Nishi Y, Auffarth GU.

    J Refract Surg. 2007 Apr;23(4):368-73.PMID: 17455832 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability and reproducibility of slit-lamp-adapted optical coherence tomography for evaluation of anterior chamber depth and central corneal thickness.

    Sandler SF, Zelefsky JR, Dorairaj S, Arthur SN, Ritch R, Liebmann JM.

    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008 Jul-Aug;39(4):299-303.PMID: 18717435 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity