My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 435

    1.

    Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding: a cross-sectional survey.

    Müllner M, Matthews H, Altman DG.

    Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jan 15;136(2):122-6.PMID: 11790063 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Summaries for patients. Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding.

    [No authors listed]

    Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jan 15;136(2):I47. No abstract available. PMID: 11928736 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    A survey of abstracts of high-impact clinical journals indicated most statistical methods presented are summary statistics.

    Taback N, Krzyzanowska MK.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Mar;61(3):277-81. Epub 2007 Sep 14.PMID: 18226751 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Research design and statistical methods in Chinese medical journals.

    Wang Q, Zhang B.

    JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):283-5.PMID: 9676683 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    The quality of reporting of orthopaedic randomized trials with use of a checklist for nonpharmacological therapies.

    Chan S, Bhandari M.

    J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89(9):1970-8.PMID: 17768194 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    A survey of statistical methodology used in Ethiopian health science research journals.

    Taddese Z.

    Ethiop Med J. 2001 Jul;39(3):229-39.PMID: 11921553 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Management of confounding in controlled orthopaedic trials: a cross-sectional study.

    Vavken P, Culen G, Dorotka R.

    Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Apr;466(4):985-9. Epub 2008 Feb 21.PMID: 18288558 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Validity of the impact factor of journals as a measure of randomized controlled trial quality.

    Barbui C, Cipriani A, Malvini L, Tansella M.

    J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;67(1):37-40.PMID: 16426086 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Reporting of study design in titles and abstracts of articles published in clinically oriented dermatology journals.

    Ubriani R, Smith N, Katz KA.

    Br J Dermatol. 2007 Mar;156(3):557-9.PMID: 17300248 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: are they related? Results of a pilot study.

    Clifford TJ, Barrowman NJ, Moher D.

    BMC Health Serv Res. 2002 Sep 4;2(1):18.PMID: 12213183 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.

    Wunsch H, Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC.

    J Crit Care. 2006 Mar;21(1):1-7.PMID: 16616616 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency.

    Nieminen P, Carpenter J, Rucker G, Schumacher M.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Sep 1;6:42.PMID: 16948835 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice.

    Pocock SJ, Collier TJ, Dandreo KJ, de Stavola BL, Goldman MB, Kalish LA, Kasten LE, McCormack VA.

    BMJ. 2004 Oct 16;329(7471):883. Epub 2004 Oct 6. Review.PMID: 15469946 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    14.

    Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review.

    Groenwold RH, Van Deursen AM, Hoes AW, Hak E.

    Ann Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;18(10):746-51. Epub 2008 Aug 9. Review.PMID: 18693038 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature.

    Martin RC 2nd, Brennan MF, Jaques DP.

    Ann Surg. 2002 Jun;235(6):803-13. Review.PMID: 12035036 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Reporting on methods of subgroup analysis in clinical trials: a survey of four scientific journals.

    Moreira ED Jr, Stein Z, Susser E.

    Braz J Med Biol Res. 2001 Nov;34(11):1441-6.PMID: 11668354 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals: caveat lector?

    Goodman SN, Altman DG, George SL.

    J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Nov;13(11):753-6.PMID: 9824521 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    Changes in study design, gender issues, and other characteristics of clinical research published in three major medical journals from 1971 to 1991.

    McDermott MM, Lefevre F, Feinglass J, Reifler D, Dolan N, Potts S, Senger K.

    J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Jan;10(1):13-8.PMID: 7699481 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Reported use of data monitoring committees in the main published reports of randomized controlled trials: a cross-sectional study.

    Sydes MR, Altman DG, Babiker AB, Parmar MK, Spiegelhalter DJ; DAMOCLES Group.

    Clin Trials. 2004 Feb;1(1):48-59.PMID: 16281462 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Research design and statistical procedures used in the Journal of Family Practice.

    Fromm BS, Snyder VL.

    J Fam Pract. 1986 Dec;23(6):564-6.PMID: 3491178 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity