My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 186

    1.

    Balloon laryngoscopy reduces head extension and blade leverage in patients with potential cervical spine injury.

    Mentzelopoulos SD, Tsitsika MV, Balanika MP, Joufi MJ, Karamichali EA.

    Crit Care. 2000;4(1):40-4. Epub 2000 Jan 24.PMID: 11056743 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy with the Bullard, Macintosh, and Miller laryngoscopes.

    Hastings RH, Vigil AC, Hanna R, Yang BY, Sartoris DJ.

    Anesthesiology. 1995 Apr;82(4):859-69.PMID: 7717556 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Comparison of the Bullard and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation of patients with a potential cervical spine injury.

    Watts AD, Gelb AW, Bach DB, Pelz DM.

    Anesthesiology. 1997 Dec;87(6):1335-42.PMID: 9416718 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Cervical spine movements during laryngoscopy. Comparison of the Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscope blades.

    MacIntyre PA, McLeod AD, Hurley R, Peacock C.

    Anaesthesia. 1999 May;54(5):413-8.PMID: 10995135 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    A comparison of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscopes.

    Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Seo N, Sugimoto H.

    Anaesthesia. 2008 Jun;63(6):635-40.PMID: 18477276 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    The use of the McCoy laryngoscope in patients with simulated cervical spine injuries.

    Laurent SC, de Melo AE, Alexander-Williams JM.

    Anaesthesia. 1996 Jan;51(1):74-5.PMID: 8669572 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Balloon versus conventional laryngoscopy: a comparison of laryngoscopic findings and intubation difficulty.

    Mentzelopoulos SD, Romana CN, Corolanoglou DS, Tzoufi MJ, Karamichali EA.

    Anesth Analg. 2000 Dec;91(6):1513-9.PMID: 11094010 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Head extension and laryngeal view during laryngoscopy with cervical spine stabilization maneuvers.

    Hastings RH, Wood PR.

    Anesthesiology. 1994 Apr;80(4):825-31.PMID: 8024137 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Laryngoscopy using the McCoy laryngoscope after application of a cervical collar.

    Gabbott DA.

    Anaesthesia. 1996 Sep;51(9):812-4.PMID: 8882239 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airway Scope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope.

    Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Seo N, Sugimoto H.

    Anaesthesia. 2007 Oct;62(10):1050-5.PMID: 17845658 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Randomized study comparing the "sniffing position" with simple head extension for laryngoscopic view in elective surgery patients.

    Adnet F, Baillard C, Borron SW, Denantes C, Lefebvre L, Galinski M, Martinez C, Cupa M, Lapostolle F.

    Anesthesiology. 2001 Oct;95(4):836-41.PMID: 11605921 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    Effects of cervical spine immobilization technique and laryngoscope blade selection on an unstable cervical spine in a cadaver model of intubation.

    Gerling MC, Davis DP, Hamilton RS, Morris GF, Vilke GM, Garfin SR, Hayden SR.

    Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Oct;36(4):293-300.PMID: 11020675 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison of the AirTraq Laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope.

    Turkstra TP, Pelz DM, Jones PM.

    Anesthesiology. 2009 Jul;111(1):97-101.PMID: 19512871 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Comparison of two Macintosh laryngoscope blades in 300 patients.

    Asai T, Matsumoto S, Fujise K, Johmura S, Shingu K.

    Br J Anaesth. 2003 Apr;90(4):457-60.PMID: 12644417 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    Craniocervical motion during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation with the Macintosh and Miller blades: an in vivo cinefluoroscopic study.

    LeGrand SA, Hindman BJ, Dexter F, Weeks JB, Todd MM.

    Anesthesiology. 2007 Dec;107(6):884-91.PMID: 18043056 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Design evaluation of commonly used rigid and levering laryngoscope blades.

    Yardeni IZ, Gefen A, Smolyarenko V, Zeidel A, Beilin B.

    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Sep;46(8):1003-9.PMID: 12190803 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    The usefulness of the modified laryngoscopic blade for training novice laryngoscopists.

    Lee J, Kim BS, Chang HW, Lee Y.

    J Clin Anesth. 2005 Aug;17(5):334-8. Erratum in: J Clin Anesth. 2005 Nov;17(7):572. PMID: 16102681 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Force and torque vary between laryngoscopists and laryngoscope blades.

    Hastings RH, Hon ED, Nghiem C, Wahrenbrock EA.

    Anesth Analg. 1996 Mar;82(3):462-8.PMID: 8623943 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    Motion of a cadaver model of cervical injury during endotracheal intubation with a Bullard laryngoscope or a Macintosh blade with and without in-line stabilization.

    Turner CR, Block J, Shanks A, Morris M, Lodhia KR, Gujar SK.

    J Trauma. 2009 Jul;67(1):61-6.PMID: 19590309 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Determination of the distance between the laryngoscope blade and the upper incisors during direct laryngoscopy: comparisons of a curved, an angulated straight, and two straight blades.

    Watanabe S, Suga A, Asakura N, Takeshima R, Kimura T, Taguchi N, Kumagai M.

    Anesth Analg. 1994 Oct;79(4):638-41.PMID: 7943768 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity