Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 136

    1.

    The first positive: computing positive predictive value at the extremes.

    Smith JE, Winkler RL, Fryback DG.

    Ann Intern Med. 2000 May 16;132(10):804-9.PMID: 10819704 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    [Stepwise diagnostic workup in general practice as a consequence of the Bayesian reasoning]

    Schneider A, Dinant GJ, Szecsenyi J.

    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2006;100(2):121-7. German. PMID: 16686446 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Improving the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: predictive value of screening tests.

    Phelps JR, Ghaemi SN.

    J Affect Disord. 2006 Jun;92(2-3):141-8. Epub 2006 Mar 9. Review.PMID: 16529822 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    LCR testing for gonorrhoea and chlamydia in population surveys and other screenings of low prevalence populations: coping with decreased positive predictive value.

    Zenilman JM, Miller WC, Gaydos C, Rogers SM, Turner CF.

    Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Apr;79(2):94-7.PMID: 12690126 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Performance characteristics and quality control of community based ultrasound surveys for cystic and alveolar echinococcosis.

    Macpherson CN, Milner R.

    Acta Trop. 2003 Feb;85(2):203-9. Review.PMID: 12606098 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Bayes' theorem applied to perimetric progression detection in glaucoma: from specificity to positive predictive value.

    Jansonius NM.

    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 May;243(5):433-7. Epub 2004 Dec 1.PMID: 15578199 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Uncertainty in Bayes.

    Baron JA.

    Med Decis Making. 1994 Jan-Mar;14(1):46-51.PMID: 8152356 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Bayes' theorem and diagnostic tests in neuropsychology: interval estimates for post-test probabilities.

    Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH, Betkowska K.

    Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 May;23(4):624-44. Epub 2009 Feb 20.PMID: 19235634 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Estimation of prevalence on the basis of screening tests.

    Lew RA, Levy PS.

    Stat Med. 1989 Oct;8(10):1225-30.PMID: 2814071 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Reflections on accuracy.

    Gambino B.

    J Gambl Stud. 2006 Dec;22(4):393-404. Review.PMID: 17096201 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    The magnitude and challenge of false-positive newborn screening test results.

    Kwon C, Farrell PM.

    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jul;154(7):714-8.PMID: 10891024 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    False-positive gonorrhea test results with a nucleic acid amplification test: the impact of low prevalence on positive predictive value.

    Katz AR, Effler PV, Ohye RG, Brouillet B, Lee MV, Whiticar PM.

    Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Mar 15;38(6):814-9. Epub 2004 Feb 27.PMID: 14999624 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    An investigation of new toxicity test method performance in validation studies: 1. Toxicity test methods that have predictive capacity no greater than chance.

    Bruner LH, Carr GJ, Harbell JW, Curren RD.

    Hum Exp Toxicol. 2002 Jun;21(6):305-12.PMID: 12195934 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards.

    Hui SL, Zhou XH.

    Stat Methods Med Res. 1998 Dec;7(4):354-70. Review.PMID: 9871952 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    A Bayesian sensitivity analysis of out-of-hospital 12-lead electrocardiograms: implications for regionalization of cardiac care.

    Youngquist ST, Kaji AH, Lipsky AM, Koenig WJ, Niemann JT.

    Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Dec;14(12):1165-71.PMID: 18045892 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.

    Kirkland D, Pfuhler S, Tweats D, Aardema M, Corvi R, Darroudi F, Elhajouji A, Glatt H, Hastwell P, Hayashi M, Kasper P, Kirchner S, Lynch A, Marzin D, Maurici D, Meunier JR, Müller L, Nohynek G, Parry J, Parry E, Thybaud V, Tice R, van Benthem J, Vanparys P, White P.

    Mutat Res. 2007 Mar 30;628(1):31-55. Epub 2007 Jan 13.PMID: 17293159 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    [A new concept and method of standardizing predictive value]

    Shen H, Chen Q.

    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 1994 Dec;15(6):360-2. Chinese. PMID: 7874707 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard.

    Joseph L, Gyorkos TW, Coupal L.

    Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Feb 1;141(3):263-72.PMID: 7840100 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    State newborn screening in the tandem mass spectrometry era: more tests, more false-positive results.

    Tarini BA, Christakis DA, Welch HG.

    Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):448-56.PMID: 16882794 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data