Similar articles for PMID: 8721797

Year	Number of Results
1990	2
1996	3
1998	1
1999	3
2000	1
2001	2
2002	7
2003	1
2004	2
2005	6
2006	3
2007	7
2008	2
2009	4
2010	2
2011	5
2012	1
2013	2
2014	5
2015	4
2016	6
2017	6
2018	3
2019	3
2020	3
2021	2
2024	0

1

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Jadad AR, et al. Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4. Control Clin Trials. 1996. PMID: 8721797

2

Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review.

Superchi C, González JA, Solà I, Cobo E, Hren D, Boutron I. Superchi C, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 6;19(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0688-x. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019. PMID: 30841850 Free PMC article.

3

Assessment of methodologic quality of randomized trials of interventional techniques: development of an interventional pain management specific instrument.

Manchikanti L, Hirsch JA, Cohen SP, Heavner JE, Falco FJ, Diwan S, Boswell MV, Candido KD, Onyewu CO, Zhu J, Sehgal N, Kaye AD, Benyamin RM, Helm S 2nd, Singh V, Datta S, Abdi S, Christo PJ, Hameed H, Hameed M, Vallejo R, Pampati V, Racz GB, Raj PP. Manchikanti L, et al. Pain Physician. 2014 May-Jun;17(3):E263-90. Pain Physician. 2014. PMID: 24850111 Free article. Review.

4

Influence of blinding on treatment effect size estimate in randomized controlled trials of oral health interventions.

Saltaji H, Armijo-Olivo S, Cummings GG, Amin M, da Costa BR, Flores-Mir C. Saltaji H, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 May 18;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0491-0. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018. PMID: 29776394 Free PMC article.

5

In the dark: the reporting of blinding status in randomized controlled trials.

Montori VM, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Manns BJ, Ghali WA, Guyatt GH. Montori VM, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Aug;55(8):787-90. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00446-8. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002. PMID: 12384193

6

Systematic review of blinding assessment in randomized controlled trials in schizophrenia and affective disorders 2000-2010.

Baethge C, Assall OP, Baldessarini RJ. Baethge C, et al. Psychother Psychosom. 2013;82(3):152-60. doi: 10.1159/000346144. Epub 2013 Mar 21. Psychother Psychosom. 2013. PMID: 23548796 Review.

7

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.

Dosenovic S, Jelicic Kadic A, Vucic K, Markovina N, Pieper D, Puljak L. Dosenovic S, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 May 8;18(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0493-y. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018. PMID: 29739339 Free PMC article.

8

Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.

Parent N, Hanley JA. Parent N, et al. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009;19(2):25-39. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19517902 English, French.

9

Assessing quality of case series studies: development and validation of an instrument by herbal medicine CAM researchers.

Yang AW, Li CG, Da Costa C, Allan G, Reece J, Xue CC. Yang AW, et al. J Altern Complement Med. 2009 May;15(5):513-22. doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.0806. J Altern Complement Med. 2009. PMID: 19432511

10

The reporting of blinding in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: where do we stand?

Abdulraheem S, Bondemark L. Abdulraheem S, et al. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Jan 23;41(1):54-58. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy021. Eur J Orthod. 2019. PMID: 29697755 Review.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

84 results

Results by year