Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Investig Genet. 2012 Jan 31;3(1):2.

    Reply to Budowle, Ge, Chakraborty and Gill-King: use of prior odds for missing persons identifications.

    Source

    Faculty of Law and Criminal Justice, School of Criminal Justice, Institute of Forensic Science, University of Lausanne, le Batochime, 1015 Lausanne-Dorigny, Switzerland. alex.biedermann@unil.ch.

    Abstract

    ABSTRACT: Prior probabilities represent a core element of the Bayesian probabilistic approach to relatedness testing. This letter opinions on the commentary Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications by Budowle et al., published recently in this journal. Contrary to Budowle et al., we argue that the concept of prior probabilities (i) is not endowed with the notion of objectivity, (ii) is not a case for computation, and (iii) does not require new guidelines edited by the forensic DNA community--as long as probability is properly considered as an expression of personal belief.

    PMID:
    22293068
    [PubMed - in process]
    Free full text

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for BioMed Central

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk