Randomized trial of buccal versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of second trimester abortion

Contraception. 2010 May;81(5):441-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.018. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of repeat doses of buccal misoprostol compared to vaginal misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination by induction.

Study design: Women requesting termination of a pregnancy between 18 and 22 weeks gestation were approached for participation. All women received 400 mcg misoprostol vaginally on admission. Participants were randomized to receive subsequent doses of 200 mcg misoprostol every 6 h either buccally or vaginally. All participants completed an acceptability survey.

Results: Sixty-four women participated. The mean gestational age was 19.7 weeks. The median time to abortion in the buccal group was 15 h, which was not significantly different (p=0.44) from the vaginal-only group of 12 h. Most women in both groups preferred their allocated administrative route.

Conclusion: Repeat doses of buccal misoprostol are as effective as vaginal misoprostol in inducing abortions in the midtrimester and are highly acceptable to most women. It is reasonable to offer both options to women.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal / administration & dosage*
  • Abortion, Induced / methods*
  • Administration, Intravaginal
  • Administration, Oral
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Misoprostol / administration & dosage*
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Trimester, Second*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal
  • Misoprostol