Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Lancet. 1990 Jan 20;335(8682):149-53.

    Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials.

    Source

    Medical Statistics Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, UK.

    Abstract

    80 reports of randomised clinical trials in four leading general medical journals were reviewed. The reporting of the methodology of randomisation was inadequate. In 30% of trials there was no clear evidence that the groups had been randomised. Among trials that used simple randomisation the sample sizes in the two groups were too often similar, and there was an unexpected small bias in favour of there being fewer patients in the experimental group. The handling of comparisons of baseline characteristics was inadequate in 41% of the trials. Suggestions are made for improving standards.

    PMID:
    1967441
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Elsevier Science

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk