AP-2 α residues K297 and R340 are required for Nef-induced CD4 downregulation. HeLa cells were subjected to a 7-day siRNA-cDNA transfection protocol as described in Materials and Methods and in Table 1. Control and α siRNA-treated cells were cotransfected with three plasmids: one expressing CD4, one lacking (−) or expressing (+) Nef, and one lacking or expressing either wild-type αR (αR-WT) or αR-KR297,340EE. The cells were then prepared for FACS analysis and immunoblotting. Cells prepared for FACS analysis were either left unlabeled as a control for background fluorescence (shaded curves in all plots) or stained with PE-conjugated anti-human TfR or APC-conjugated anti-human CD4 antibodies. (A) Treatment with α siRNAs increases cell surface TfR and CD4 levels in the absence of Nef. (B) Both wild-type αR and αR-KR297,340EE prevent the increase in the levels of TfR and CD4 caused by treatment with α siRNA in the absence of Nef. (C) Nef expression downregulates CD4 in control but not α siRNA-treated HeLa cells. (D) Rescue of Nef-induced downregulation of CD4 by wild-type αR but not αR-KR297,340EE in α siRNA-treated HeLa cells. The results shown are representative of data from three independent experiments with similar results. Statistical analyses of the data from these three experiments showed that Nef-dependent CD4 downregulation (expressed as the ratio of geometric means in the absence or presence of Nef) was 4.81 ± 0.70 for control cells, 1.51 ± 0.24* for α siRNA-treated cells, 4.60 ± 0.94 for α siRNA-treated cells expressing wild-type αR, and 1.50 ± 0.04*† for α siRNA-treated cells expressing αR-KR297,340EE (mean ± standard error of the mean; n = 3), with the symbols * and † indicating values that are significantly different (P < 0.05) from those for control cells and α siRNA-treated cells expressing wild-type αR, respectively, as calculated by analysis of variance followed by two-tail Dunnett's test. (E) Aliquots of the transfected cells from all experimental groups were lysed and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting (IB) with the antibodies indicated to the right. All cells were transfected with a plasmid encoding CD4, together with the plasmids and oligonucleotides indicated in the grid above the lanes (+, present; −, absent; KREE, KR297,340EE mutant). Notice that the anti-AP-2 α clone 100/2 recognized both endogenous isoforms of α-adaptin, αA and αC (apparent as an ∼100-kDa doublet in which the upper and lower bands represent αA and αC, respectively) (5), as well as a nonspecific band (∼85 kDa). The anti-AP-2 α clone 8/Adaptin α, however, recognized only endogenous αA-adaptin since it was raised against a fragment of this isoform. TheV5-tagged, RNAi-resistant αC rescue constructs were detected by both the 100/2 anti-α antibody and the anti-V5 antibody. Immunoblotting with anti-α-tubulin was used as a loading control. Numbers to the left indicate the positions of molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons).