Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Mar;14(3):440-7.

    The influence of one's own body weight on implicit and explicit anti-fat bias.

    Source

    Yale University, Department of Psychology, P.O. Box 208205, New Haven, CT 06520-8205, USA. marlene.schwartz@yale.edu

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE:

    This study examined the influence of one's own body weight on the strength of implicit and explicit anti-fat bias.

    RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURE:

    Implicit and explicit anti-fat attitudes and obesity stereotypes were assessed among a large online sample (N = 4283) that included representation from across the weight spectrum (from underweight to extremely obese). Respondents also indicated their willingness to make a range of personal sacrifices in exchange for not being obese.

    RESULTS:

    All weight groups exhibited significant anti-fat bias, but there was an inverse relation between one's own weight and the level of observed bias. Thinner people were more likely to automatically associate negative attributes (bad, lazy) with fat people, to prefer thin people to fat people, and to explicitly rate fat people as lazier and less motivated than thin people. However, when the lazy stereotype was contrasted with another negative attribute (anxious), obese and non-obese people exhibited equally strong implicit stereotyping. Finally, a substantial proportion of respondents indicated a willingness to endure aversive life events to avoid being obese. For example, 46% of the total sample indicated that they would rather give up 1 year of life than be obese, and 30% reported that they would rather be divorced than be obese. In each case, thinner people were more willing to sacrifice aspects of their health or life circumstances than were heavier people.

    DISCUSSION:

    Although the strength of weight bias decreased as respondents' body weight increased, a significant degree of anti-fat bias was still evident among even the most obese group of respondents, highlighting the pervasiveness of this bias.

    PMID:
    16648615
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free full text

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Nature Publishing Group

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk