Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jan 1;116(1):78-84.

A consumer's guide to subgroup analyses.

Source

McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario.

Abstract

The extent to which a clinician should believe and act on the results of subgroup analyses of data from randomized trials or meta-analyses is controversial. Guidelines are provided in this paper for making these decisions. The strength of inference regarding a proposed difference in treatment effect among subgroups is dependent on the magnitude of the difference, the statistical significance of the difference, whether the hypothesis preceded or followed the analysis, whether the subgroup analysis was one of a small number of hypotheses tested, whether the difference was suggested by comparisons within or between studies, the consistency of the difference, and the existence of indirect evidence that supports the difference. Application of these guidelines will assist clinicians in making decisions regarding whether to base a treatment decision on overall results or on the results of a subgroup analysis.

Comment in

Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jul 1;117(1):93-4.

PMID:: 1530753; [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Publication Types, MeSH Terms

Publication Types

MeSH Terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources

Libraries

LinkOut Holdings

Supplemental Content

Save items

Related citations in PubMed

Review Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives. [Health Technol Assess. 2001]
Review Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
Brookes ST, Whitley E, Peters TJ, Mulheran PA, Egger M, Davey Smith G. Health Technol Assess. 2001; 5(33):1-56.
[Roaming through methodology. IX. The interpretation of subgroup analyses]. [Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998]
[Roaming through methodology. IX. The interpretation of subgroup analyses].
van der Windt DA, van Poppel MN. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Oct 10; 142(41):2245-7.
How should subgroup analyses affect clinical practice? Insights from the Metoprolol Succinate Controlled-Release/Extended-Release Randomized Intervention Trial in Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). [Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003]
How should subgroup analyses affect clinical practice? Insights from the Metoprolol Succinate Controlled-Release/Extended-Release Randomized Intervention Trial in Heart Failure (MERIT-HF).
Wikstrand J, Wedel H, Ghali J, Deedwania P, Fagerberg B, Goldstein S, Gottlieb S, Hjalmarson A, Kjekshus J, Waagstein F. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Sep; 7(3):264-75.
Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. [Value Health. 2011]
Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, Itzler R, Barrett A, Hawkins N, Lee K, Boersma C, Annemans L, Cappelleri JC. Value Health. 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28.
Review A consumer's guide to meta-analysis. [Arthritis Care Res. 1997]
Review A consumer's guide to meta-analysis.
LaValley M. Arthritis Care Res. 1997 Jun; 10(3):208-13.

See reviews... See all...

Cited by 61 PubMed Central articles

Does consideration and assessment of effects on health equity affect the conclusions of systematic reviews? A methodology study. [PLoS One. 2012]
Does consideration and assessment of effects on health equity affect the conclusions of systematic reviews? A methodology study.
Welch V, Petticrew M, Ueffing E, Benkhalti Jandu M, Brand K, Dhaliwal B, Kristjansson E, Smylie J, Wells GA, Tugwell P. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e31360. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
A controlled study of team-based learning for undergraduate clinical neurology education. [BMC Med Educ. 2011]
A controlled study of team-based learning for undergraduate clinical neurology education.
Tan NC, Kandiah N, Chan YH, Umapathi T, Lee SH, Tan K. BMC Med Educ. 2011 Oct 30; 11:91. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
Pre-referral rectal artesunate in severe malaria: flawed trial. [Trials. 2011]
Pre-referral rectal artesunate in severe malaria: flawed trial.
Hirji KF, Premji ZG. Trials. 2011 Aug 8; 12:188. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

See all...

Related information

Related Citations
Calculated set of PubMed citations closely related to the selected article(s) retrieved using a word weight algorithm. Related articles are displayed in ranked order from most to least relevant, with the “linked from” citation displayed first.
Cited in PMC
Full-text articles in the PubMed Central Database that cite the current articles.
Cited in Books
NCBI Bookshelf books that cite the current articles.

Recent activity

Clear Turn Off Turn On

A consumer's guide to subgroup analyses.
A consumer's guide to subgroup analyses.
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jan 1 ;116(1):78-84.

PubMed
Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infect...
Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jul 15 ;39(2):206-17. Epub 2004 Jul 2 .

PubMed
Diagnostic and therapeutic use of chest sonography: value in critically ill pati...
Diagnostic and therapeutic use of chest sonography: value in critically ill patients.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Oct ;159(4):695-701.

PubMed
Evidence of airborne transmission of SARS.
Evidence of airborne transmission of SARS.
N Engl J Med. 2004 Aug 5 ;351(6):609-11; author reply 609-11.

PubMed
Aggravation of vasogenic cerebral edema by multiple-dose mannitol.
Aggravation of vasogenic cerebral edema by multiple-dose mannitol.
J Neurosurg. 1992 Oct ;77(4):584-9.

PubMed

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

PubMed

Result Filters

Display Settings:

Send to: