Abstract

A 1990 nation-wide survey on technology acquisition in Canadian hospitals, based on 509 Anglophone and 55 Francophone hospital questionnaires and 193 hospital equipment request forms, revealed that 53% of capital funds were used to replace existing equipment, with the remainder spent on new purchases. However, very little regional planning was taking place. Most of the institutional acquisition decisions were made by committees, 17% of which were classified as medical staff, 25.1% as administrative, 32.4% as board committees and 22.5% as mixed. Although administration was heavily represented, medical staff were frequently present and nursing was just as likely to have at least minimal representation. However, technical experts usually played a minimal role. This omission, combined with the limited information asked for on equipment request forms and the limited availability and use of technology assessment information, suggests that acquisition decisions in many Canadian hospitals are likely to be based on inadequate information.