Home > Search Results
  • We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

Results: 1 to 20 of 78

Effectiveness and safety of sufentanil-propofol versus remifentanil-propofol during total intravenous anesthesia for neurosurgery: a systematic review

Bibliographic details: Yang TT, Tan YY, Zhang XA.  Effectiveness and safety of sufentanil-propofol versus remifentanil-propofol during total intravenous anesthesia for neurosurgery: a systematic review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 2013; 13(12): 1492-1499

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2013

Effectiveness and safety of 5-HT, receptor antagonists in preventing propofol injection induced pain: a meta-analysis

Bibliographic details: Li SY, Wang X.  Effectiveness and safety of 5-HT, receptor antagonists in preventing propofol injection induced pain: a meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 2013; 13(4): 452-460

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2013

Effect of ephedrine on intubating conditions created by propofol and rocuronium: a meta-analysis

Bibliographic details: Sun R, Tian JH, Li L, Tian HL, Jia WQ, Yang KH, Cao N.  Effect of ephedrine on intubating conditions created by propofol and rocuronium: a meta-analysis. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 2012; 5(4): 209-215 Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.12003/abstract

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2012

Flurbiprofen axetil for prevention of propofol injection pain in adult --- a systematic review

Bibliographic details: Sun Y, Li T, Chai F, Gan TJ.  Flurbiprofen axetil for prevention of propofol injection pain in adult --- a systematic review. Internet Journal of Anesthesiology 2011; 28: 1 Available from: http://archive.ispub.com/journal/the-internet-journal-of-anesthesiology/volume-28-number-1/flurbiprofen-axetil-for-prevention-of-propofol-injection-pain-in-adult-a-systematic-review.html

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2011

Effects of lidocaine on preventing pain on injection of propofol: a meta-analysis

Bibliographic details: NiuL, Xuan Y, WAng J.  Effects of lidocaine on preventing pain on injection of propofol: a meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 2013; 13(9): 1129-1136 Available from: http://www.cjebm.org.cn/oa/DArticle.aspx?type=view&id=20130917

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2013

Sedative effect of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on postoperative patients in ICU: a systematic review

Bibliographic details: Zhuo S, Zheng JQ, Liu B.  Sedative effect of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on postoperative patients in ICU: a systematic review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 2012; 12(6): 686-693 Available from: http://www.cjebm.org.cn/oa/DArticle.aspx?type=view&id=201206013

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2012

Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review

In this systematic review we focused on postoperative recovery and complications using four different anesthetic techniques. The database MEDLINE was searched via PubMed (1966 to June 2002) using the search words "anesthesia" and with ambulatory surgical procedures limited to randomized controlled trials in adults (>19 yr), in the English language, and in humans. A second search strategy was used combining two of the words "propofol," "isoflurane," "sevoflurane," or "desflurane". Screening and data extraction produced 58 articles that were included in the final meta-analysis. No differences were found between propofol and isoflurane in early recovery. However, early recovery was faster with desflurane compared with propofol and isoflurane and with sevoflurane compared with isoflurane. A minor difference was found in home readiness between sevoflurane and isoflurane (5 min) but not among the other anesthetics. Nausea, vomiting, headache, and postdischarge nausea and vomiting incidence were in favor of propofol compared with isoflurane (P < 0.05). A larger number of patients in the inhaled anesthesia groups required antiemetics compared with the propofol group. We conclude that the differences in early recovery times among the different anesthetics were small and in favor of the inhaled anesthetics. The incidence of side effects, specifically postoperative nausea and vomiting, was less frequent with propofol. IMPLICATIONS: A systematic analysis of the literature comparing postoperative recovery after propofol, isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane-based anesthesia in adults demonstrated that early recovery was faster in the desflurane and sevoflurane groups. The incidence of nausea and vomiting were less frequent with propofol.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2004

Propofol vs traditional sedative agents for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis

The review concluded that propofol sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography led to shorter recovery time without an increase in cardiopulmonary side-effects. The review was generally well conducted. The authors? conclusions are based on the evidence and appear reasonable. The call for further research on side-effects, notably hypotension, appears warranted.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2011

Low-dose ketamine in addition to propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department

This review concluded that there is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of low-dose ketamine combined with propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department setting. Although the review has a number of weaknesses, this conclusion is appropriate.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2007

Propofol versus traditional sedative agents for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis

This review compared the complication rates of propofol with traditional sedative agents used during gastrointestinal endoscopy. The authors concluded that the risk of cardiopulmonary complications appeared lower during colonoscopy, but there was no difference in complications for other endoscopic procedures. The authors' conclusions should be treated with caution as their results only pertain to hypoxia and hypotension, not all cardiopulmonary complications.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2005

Safety and clinical effectiveness of midazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review

This review concluded that midazolam and propofol were equally safe and effective for procedural sedation of adults in the emergency department, and that use of one agent over the other should be guided by resource utilisation and treatment costs. The authors? conclusions appeared to reflect the evidence, but the limitations with the included studies should be borne in mind.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2008

Propofol combined with traditional sedative agents versus propofol- alone sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sedation of propofol combined with traditional sedative agents (PTSA) for gastrointestinal endoscopy, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PTSA with propofol-alone sedation.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2013

A review of the use of propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department

This review assessed the effects of propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department. The authors concluded that the evidence suggests that propofol is safe and effective, but the studies generally used deeper sedation than that recommended in the UK for non-anaesthetists. Poor reporting of the review methods and differences between the studies make it difficult to confirm the robustness of the conclusions.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2006

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of propofol with midazolam for sedation of patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of propofol with midazolam for sedation of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2014

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of propofol with midazolam for sedation of patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of propofol with midazolam for sedation of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2014

Lower incidence of emergence agitation in children after propofol anesthesia compared with sevoflurane: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Emergence agitation (EA) from general anesthesia has been reported as an adverse effect of sevoflurane in children. We describe a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the incidence of EA between children who underwent sevoflurane anesthesia and those who underwent propofol anesthesia.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2013

Combination of ketamine and propofol versus either agent alone for procedural sedation in the emergency department

PURPOSE: The safety of using ketamine-propofol combinations as an alternative to using either agent alone for procedural sedation is discussed.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2011

Propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department: a qualitative systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of propofol compared to other agents for procedural sedation of adults in the emergency department (ED) and to review the use of opioids in conjunction with propofol for procedural sedation in the ED.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2013

Review article: safety profile of propofol for paediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department

This review concluded that use of propofol for paediatric procedural sedation was associated with a low rate of minor adverse events and major adverse events with propofol sedation were extremely rare. These conclusions should be interpreted cautiously given concerns about the review methods and the possibility of publication and language biases.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2010

Effect of propofol and inhalation anesthesia on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of propofol and inhalation anesthesia on the incidence of early postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in elderly patients undergoing noncardiac surgeries.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Version: 2012

Systematic Reviews in PubMed

See all (218)...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...