Home > DARE Reviews > Preventing unintentional injuries to...
  • We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].

Preventing unintentional injuries to children in the home: a systematic review of the effectiveness of programmes supplying and/or installing home safety equipment

Review published: 2011.

Bibliographic details: Pearson M, Garside R, Moxham T, Anderson R.  Preventing unintentional injuries to children in the home: a systematic review of the effectiveness of programmes supplying and/or installing home safety equipment. Health Promotion International 2011; 26(3): 376-392. [PubMed: 21131627]

Quality assessment

This review concluded that few injury prevention programmes reduced injury rates in children in the home and distribution of smoke alarms alone was insufficient for improving installation rates. Evidence was mixed for effectiveness on installation rates of other home safety equipment. Potential for publication and language biases and bias and errors in the review process mean that the authors' conclusions should be interpreted with caution. Full critical summary

Abstract

In children under the age of five, the majority of unintentional injuries occur in the home, with higher levels of injury morbidity and mortality being found among those from more deprived backgrounds. This paper presents the findings of a systematic review about the effectiveness of programmes in decreasing unintentional injury rates to children (aged up to 15 years) in the home. The effectiveness of the provision of home safety equipment with or without installation, safety education or a home risk assessment is presented by outcome: injury rates, installation of smoke alarms and installation of other home safety equipment. Analysis of the statistically significant evidence suggests that few programmes reduce injury rates in children except where home safety equipment is supplied in conjunction with a home risk assessment, although this effect was only evident in households where a child had previously suffered an unintentional injury. The distribution of smoke alarms alone is insufficient for improving installation rates; programmes containing an education component showed more success. Interventions integrated into wider health programmes, where trusting relationships with householders were cultivated and/or where specific safety issues identified by a community were responded to also showed greater success in increasing smoke alarm installation rates. The evidence of effectiveness on installation rates of other home safety equipment is highly mixed, although there is some evidence to suggest that installation rates always decrease after 6 months. Where stair gates are both supplied and installed, inequalities in rates of use may be reduced.

CRD has determined that this article meets the DARE scientific quality criteria for a systematic review.

Copyright © 2013 University of York.

PubMed Health Blog...

read all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...