NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].
Show detailsBibliographic details: Wittneben JG, Wright RF, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single-tooth restorations. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2009; 22(5): 466-471. [PubMed: 20095195]
Abstract
PURPOSE: This systematic review sought to determine the long-term clinical survival rates of single-tooth restorations fabricated with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) technology, as well as the frequency of failures depending on the CAD/CAM system, the type of restoration, the selected material, and the luting agent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search from 1985 to 2007 was performed using two databases: Medline/PubMed and Embase. Selected keywords and well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria guided the search. All articles were first reviewed by title, then by abstract, and subsequently by a full text reading. Data were assessed and extracted by two independent examiners. The pooled results were statistically analyzed and the overall failure rate was calculated by assuming a Poisson-distributed number of events. In addition, reported failures were analyzed by CAD/CAM system, type of restoration, restorative material, and luting agent.
RESULTS: From a total of 1,957 single-tooth restorations with a mean exposure time of 7.9 years and 170 failures, the failure rate was 1.75% per year, estimated per 100 restoration years (95% CI: 1.22% to 2.52%). The estimated total survival rate after 5 years of 91.6% (95% CI: 88.2% to 94.1%) was based on random-effects Poisson regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival rates for CAD/CAM single-tooth Cerec 1, Cerec 2, and Celay restorations appear to be similar to conventional ones. No clinical studies or randomized clinical trials reporting on other CAD/CAM systems currently used in clinical practice and with follow-up reports of 3 or more years were found at the time of the search.
- Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Tooth-Supported Ceramic Restorations: A Systematic Review.[Int J Periodontics Restorative...]Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Tooth-Supported Ceramic Restorations: A Systematic Review.Alves de Carvalho IF, Santos Marques TM, Araújo FM, Azevedo LF, Donato H, Correia A. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Jul/Aug; 38(4):e68-e78.
- Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.[Int J Prosthodont. 2010]Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.Vanoorbeek S, Vandamme K, Lijnen I, Naert I. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 May-Jun; 23(3):223-30.
- Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Particle-Filled Composite Resin CAD/CAM Partial Crowns after 24 Months.[J Prosthodont. 2018]Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Particle-Filled Composite Resin CAD/CAM Partial Crowns after 24 Months.Zimmermann M, Koller C, Reymus M, Mehl A, Hickel R. J Prosthodont. 2018 Oct; 27(8):694-699. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
- Review CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures.[Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants...]Review CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures.Kapos T, Evans C. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl:117-36.
- Review Survival and complications of computer aided-designing and computer-aided manufacturing vs. conventionally fabricated implant-supported reconstructions: a systematic review.[Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009]Review Survival and complications of computer aided-designing and computer-aided manufacturing vs. conventionally fabricated implant-supported reconstructions: a systematic review.Harder S, Kern M. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4:48-54.
- A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single-tooth restorat...A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single-tooth restorations - Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...