Home > DARE Reviews > Lung-protective mechanical ventilation...
  • We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews.

Lung-protective mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes in patients not suffering from acute lung injury: a review of clinical studies

Review published: 2008.

Bibliographic details: Schultz M J.  Lung-protective mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes in patients not suffering from acute lung injury: a review of clinical studies. Medical Science. Monitor 2008; 14(2): RA22-RA26. [PubMed: 18227773]

Quality assessment

This review investigated the effects of mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes on ventilator-associated lung injury in patients without acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The author concluded that the use of lower tidal volumes was associated with a reduction in ventilator-associated lung injury, but inconsistent results were also found in some studies. Without further details on study quality and given the other methodological concerns in the review process, the author's conclusions may not be reliable. Full critical summary

Abstract

Two randomized controlled trials confirmed the existence of so-called ventilator-associated lung injury by showing reduced morbidity and mortality with the use of lower tidal volumes in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) or its more severe form, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). While guidelines now strongly advise using lower tidal volumes in ALI/ARDS patients, at present there are no widely agreed upon guidelines for setting tidal volumes in patients who do not suffer from ALI/ARDS. The literature was searched for clinical studies on lung-protective mechanical ventilation using lower tidal volumes in patients not suffering from ALI/ARDS. The best available evidence comes from large retrospective or observational studies which suggest a causal relation between the use of large tidal volumes and the development of lung injury. The inconsistent results from smaller randomized controlled trials, however, do not definitely support the use of lower tidal volumes. The association with potentially injurious ventilator settings, in particular large tidal volumes, suggests that additional lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients without ALI/ARDS is, in part, a preventable complication. Nevertheless, more prospective studies are needed to evaluate optimal ventilator management strategies for patients not suffering from ALI/ARDS.

CRD has determined that this article meets the DARE scientific quality criteria for a systematic review.

Copyright © 2014 University of York.

PubMed Health Blog...

read all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...