Home > DARE Reviews > Systematic review of peer-support...
  • We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews.

Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer

Review published: 2008.

Bibliographic details: Hoey LM, Leropoli SC, White VM, Jefford M.  Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer. Patient Education and Counseling 2008; 70(3): 315-337. [PubMed: 18191527]

Quality assessment

The authors concluded that limited evidence suggested there were high levels of cancer patient satisfaction with peer-support programmes, but mixed evidence about the psychological benefits; further research was required. Some aspects of the review were well-conducted and the authors? cautious conclusion appeared to reflect the evidence presented. Full critical summary

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify models of peer support for cancer patients and systematically review evidence of their effectiveness in improving psychosocial adjustment.

METHODS: CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), MEDLINE and PsychINFO databases were used to identify relevant literature published from 1980 to April 2007. Data on characteristics of the peer-support program, sample size, design, measures, and findings were extracted and papers were also rated with respect to research quality (categories 'poor', 'fair' or 'good').

RESULTS: Forty-three research papers that included data from at least 1 group were reviewed in detail, including 26 descriptive papers, 8 non-randomized comparative papers, and 10 papers reporting eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Five models of peer support were identified: one-on-one face-to-face, one-on-one telephone, group face-to-face, group telephone, and group Internet.

CONCLUSION: Papers indicated a high level of satisfaction with peer-support programs; however, evidence for psychosocial benefit was mixed.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: One-on-one face-to-face and group Internet peer-support programs should be given priority when considering ways to offer peer support. Nevertheless, the other models discussed in this review should not be dismissed until further research is conducted with a wide range of cancer populations.

CRD has determined that this article meets the DARE scientific quality criteria for a systematic review.

Copyright © 2013 University of York.

PubMed Health Blog...

read all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...