Home > DARE Reviews > Do biochemical measures change in living...
  • We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].

Do biochemical measures change in living kidney donors: a systematic review

Review published: 2007.

Bibliographic details: Young A, Nevis I F, Geddes C, Gill J, Boudville N, Storsley L, Garg A X.  Do biochemical measures change in living kidney donors: a systematic review. Nephron Clinical Practice 2007; 107(3): c82-c89. [PubMed: 17890875]


BACKGROUND: Living kidney donation provides a unique opportunity to assess possible biochemical changes attributable to small decrements in glomerular filtration rate. We reviewed studies which followed 5 or more healthy donors, where changes in biochemical measures or anemia were assessed at least 4 months after nephrectomy.

METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation databases, and reviewed reference lists from 1966 through June 2006. We abstracted data on study and donor characteristics and biochemical outcomes of interest.

RESULTS: Eight studies examined at least one outcome of interest. The average time after donation ranged from 0.4 to 11 years, the postdonation creatinine clearance ranged from 73 to 99 ml/min, and the decrement after donation ranged from 11 to 38 ml/min. Nephrectomy did not change hemoglobin, erythropoietin, serum phosphate, calcium or C-reactive protein levels. The studies were inconsistent as to whether parathyroid hormone levels increased and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels decreased after nephrectomy. Uric acid levels increased variably post-donation. Plasma homocysteine increased in the single study included in this review.

CONCLUSIONS: The mechanistic changes described above and their prognostic significance need clarification. Based on existing evidence, it is not necessary to routinely monitor living kidney donors for changes in these biochemical measures.

(c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

CRD has determined that this article meets the DARE scientific quality criteria for a systematic review.

Copyright © 2014 University of York.

PubMed Health Blog...

read all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...