Home > DARE Reviews > Outcomes of involuntary hospital...
  • We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews.

Outcomes of involuntary hospital admission: a review

Review published: 2006.

Bibliographic details: Katsakou C, Priebe S.  Outcomes of involuntary hospital admission: a review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2006; 114(4): 232-241. [PubMed: 16968360]

Quality assessment

The authors concluded that a substantial number of patients admitted involuntarily to general psychiatric units did not feel their admission was justified or beneficial. The conclusions should be viewed with some caution, given the lack of reporting of review methods and limited quality of the included studies. Full critical summary

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This paper reviews studies on outcomes of involuntary hospital admissions in general adult psychiatry, and predictors of outcomes.

METHOD: Studies assessing observer-rated clinical change and self-rated outcomes were identified. Relevant databases were searched and authors were contacted. Studies were classified according to quality criteria.

RESULTS: Eighteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most involuntarily admitted patients show substantial clinical improvement over time. Retrospectively, between 33% and 81% of patients regard the admission as justified and/or the treatment as beneficial. Data on predictors of outcomes is limited and inconsistent. Patients with more marked clinical improvement tend to have more positive retrospective judgements.

CONCLUSION: A substantial number of involuntary patients do retrospectively not feel that their admission was justified and beneficial. At least for this group, new approaches might have to be considered. Larger studies are required to identify predictors on which patients are likely to fall into this group.

CRD has determined that this article meets the DARE scientific quality criteria for a systematic review.

Copyright © 2014 University of York.

PubMed Health Blog...

read all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...