Home > DARE Reviews > A systematic review of mammography...
  • We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].

A systematic review of mammography educational interventions for low-income women

Review published: 2005.

Bibliographic details: Bailey T M, Delva J, Gretebeck K, Siefert K, Ismail A.  A systematic review of mammography educational interventions for low-income women. American Journal of Health Promotion 2005; 20(2): 96-107. [PMC free article: PMC1820866] [PubMed: 16295701]

Quality assessment

The review concluded that peer-led interventions providing logistical assistance, based on multi-component strategies, are most effective in increasing uptake of mammography screening in low-income women. This conclusion is limited by the presentation of the available evidence, and also needs to be supported by studies that compare peer-led with non peer-led interventions. Full critical summary


OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review to examine the effectiveness of educational interventions in increasing mammography screening among low-income women.

DATA SOURCES: Bibliographic databases, including MEDLINE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the ISI Web of Science, were searched for relevant articles. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Randomized, community-based trials targeting low-income women and published between January 1980 and March 2003 were included.

DATA EXTRACTION: The search yielded 242 studies; 24 met all inclusion criteria.

DATA SYNTHESIS: Three studies used mammography vans, three used low-cost vouchers or provided free mammograms, three used home visits, one used community education alone, one provided referrals, five incorporated multiple intervention strategies, two used phone calls, one used videos and print material, and five used primarily print material.

RESULTS: Of nine studies that reduced barriers to care via mammography vans, cost vouchers, or home visits, eight showed statistically significant increases in mammography screening. Seven of the eight studies that used peer educators had significant increases in screening, as did four of the five studies that used multiple (intervention) components.

CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that used peer educators, incorporated multiple intervention strategies, or provided easy access via vans, cost vouchers, or home visits were effective in increasing screenings. Mailed letter or telephone reminders were not effective in trials involving low-income women, which is contrary to findings from middle/upper-income studies.

CRD has determined that this article meets the DARE scientific quality criteria for a systematic review.

Copyright © 2012 University of York.

PubMed Health Blog...

read all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...