Home > DARE Reviews > Acne: comparing hormonal approaches to...
  • We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].

Acne: comparing hormonal approaches to antibiotics and isotretinoin

Review published: 2003.

Bibliographic details: Larsen T H, Jemec G B.  Acne: comparing hormonal approaches to antibiotics and isotretinoin. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 2003; 4(7): 1097-1103. [PubMed: 12831336]

Abstract

Acne is a common and disfiguring disease affecting a significant proportion of the general population. In milder cases topical therapy is sufficient. However, in more severe cases where papulopustular or nodulocystic acne is present, there is a need of systemic treatment. The latter include antibiotics, anti-androgens and retinoids. A systematic review of the literature was performed of systemic monotherapy using these drugs. Because of the significant methodological variability of the studies examined, it was not possible to make a meta-analysis. Instead the overall effects were assessed by calculating mean weighted effects across different reported effect variables. Isotretinoin scored 85 +/- 10% improvement compared with the baseline, whereas tetracyclines and cyproterone acetate plus ethinyloestradiol were less effective (54 +/- 3% versus 65 +/- 4% improvement compared with baseline, respectively). Moreover, studies suggested that isotretinoin reduces the risk of acne relapse in the few studies that included a follow-up period. A number of restrictions limit the general use of these drugs as monotherapy, e.g., potential teratogenicity. There is a continued need for effective drugs for the therapy of acne, although judicious combined use of existing topical and systemic therapies offers great relief to many patients. In addition, methodological problems in previous studies prevent adequate synthesis of existing knowledge within the framework of evidence-based medicine. There is therefore a demand for future standardisation of further acne studies to enable direct comparison of different treatment efficacies.

CRD has determined that this article meets the DARE scientific quality criteria for a systematic review.

Copyright © 2014 University of York.

PubMed Health Blog...

read all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...