• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

Table 5.2.5Sleep efficiency (%TST) in randomized controlled trials of CPAP vs. sham control

Study
PMID
Baseline AHI (SD) [eligibility]Baseline ESS (SD)Duration (design)InterventionsNo. AnalyzedBaseline (SD)Final (SD)Net diff or diff95% CIP BtwDropout, %Study Quality
Haensel 2007148
17503102
58 (30) [≥15]nd2 wk (PL)CPAP2580.3 (2.3)87.5 (1.5)3.32.3, 4.3 *NS0B
Sham CPAP2582.0 (1.6)85.9 (1.6)
Loredo 1999153
10593774
Yu 1999154
10504011
Bardwell 2001155
11485111
Profant 2003156
12571548
44 (25) [RDI 20]nd1 wk (PL)CPAP2383.7 (10.7)88.1 (8.6)2.9−4.1, 9.9 NS14B
Sham CPAP1882.2 (11.8)83.7 (12.9)
*

Estimated from reported data.

Estimated from reported data.

Estimated from reported data.

Estimated from reported data.

From: Appendix D, Summary Tables

Cover of Diagnosis and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults
Diagnosis and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 32.
Balk EM, Moorthy D, Obadan NO, et al.

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.