Chinese multi-provincial cohort study

Derivation of prognostic modelLiu et al. 2004
Location & date
Population characteristics
Inclusion, co-morbidity
Risk factors
Outcome
Prediction period
Statistical methodsRe-calibration of Framingham-Anderson using mean values of risk factors and mean incidence rates from the Chinese Multi-provincial Cohort Study cohort. Calibration was improved substantially but did not improve discriminatory ability.
Practical
Authors notes
Modifications, tools or guidelines
External validation
Convergent validation
Trials of health outcomes

From: Appendix 3, Prognostic models or risk scoring methods for use in targeting primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (part completed)

Cover of A Systematic Review of Risk Scoring Methods and Clinical Decision Aids Used in the Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease (Supplement)
A Systematic Review of Risk Scoring Methods and Clinical Decision Aids Used in the Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease (Supplement) [Internet].
NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 67S.
Beswick AD, Brindle P, Fahey T, et al.
Copyright © 2008, Royal College of General Practitioners.

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.