Home > For Consumers > Comprehensive geriatric assessment for...
  • We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: Plain Language Summaries [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2003-.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: Plain Language Summaries.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital

This version published: 2011; Review content assessed as up-to-date: June 07, 2010.

Plain language summary

This review investigates whether specialist, organised and co‐ordinated geriatric care (normally referred to as comprehensive geriatric assessment or CGA) is better for patient outcomes than conventional care in a hospital setting. There is a clear and significant improvement in the chances of a patient being alive and in their own home at up to a year after an emergency hospital admission if they receive co‐ordinated specialist services. This effect is consistently seen from trials of geriatric wards where patients are admitted to a dedicated ward area and receive care from a specialist multidisciplinary team. This effect was not clearly seen where patients remained in a general ward and received assessment from a visiting specialist multi‐disciplinary team.


Background: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional, interdisciplinary diagnostic process to determine the medical, psychological and functional capabilities of a frail elderly person in order to develop a co‐ordinated and integrated plan for treatment and long‐term follow up.

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of CGA in hospital for older adults admitted as an emergency.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AARP Ageline, and handsearched high‐yield journals.

Selection criteria: We searched for randomised controlled trials comparing CGA (whether by mobile teams or in designated wards) to usual care.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors initially assessed eligibility and trial quality and extracted published data.

Main results: Twenty‐two trials evaluating 10,315 participants in six countries were identified. Patients in receipt of CGA were more likely to be alive and in their own homes at up to six months (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.42, P = 0.0002) and at the end of scheduled follow up (median 12 months) (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.28, P = 0.003) when compared to general medical care. In addition, patients were less likely to be institutionalised (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.88, P < 0.0001). They were less likely to suffer death or deterioration (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.90, P = 0.001), and were more likely to experience improved cognition in the CGA group (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.01, P = 0.02). Subgroup interaction in the primary outcomes suggests that the effects of CGA are primarily the result of CGA wards.

Authors' conclusions: Comprehensive geriatric assessment increases a patient's likelihood of being alive and in their own home at up to 12 months.

Editorial Group: Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group.

Publication status: New.

Citation: Ellis G, Whitehead MA, O'Neill D, Langhorne P, Robinson D. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD006211. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006211.pub2. Link to Cochrane Library. [PubMed: 21735403]

Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PubMed Health Blog...

read all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...