Comparison: Hypnotherapy vs waiting list control

OutcomeMeta-analysis detailsSummary Statisticsp (hetero) and I2Comments:Study qualityDirectnessImprecisionInconsistencyReporting BiasGRADE CommentsGRADE Evidence Rating
Global improvement of IBS symptoms (no of patients)2 trials; 41 patients; from MA; (parallel design);OR=3.85 (95%CI 2.03, 7.29)p=0.18; I2=45%Statistically significant, favours hypnotherapy; OR calculated for 1 studyGoodIndirect setting-minor, secondary care OPDSparse dataconsistent---Overall improvement of symptoms and general well being. 1/2 severe refractory IBS.
Secondary care.
Moderate
Global improvement of IBS symptoms (mean score)1 trial; 30 patients; from RCT; (parallel design);MD=2.43 (95%CI 0, 0)Statistically significant, favours hypnotherapy; SDs not given, but p<0.0001. Scale 0–3.GoodIndirect setting-minor, secondary care OPDSparse dataconsistent---Overall improvement of symptoms and general well being.
Severe refractory IBS. Secondary care. Two therapies delivered by same therapist - possible therapist effect.
Moderate/Low
Global IBS symptom score1 trial; 81 patients; from RCT; (parallel design);MD=−8.5 (95%CI −14.54, − 2.46)Statistically significant, favours hypnotherapy. Baseline scores ~40; scale probably 22 to 154GoodDirectPreciseconsistent---Change from baseline at 12 weeks (follow up 7 weeks after end of treatment); primary care; refractory IBSHigh
Global IBS symptom score1 trial; 81 patients; from RCT; (parallel design);MD=−2.7 (95%CI −10.48, 5.08)Not significant. Baseline scores ~40; scale probably 22 to 154Poor drop outsDirectPreciseconsistent---Change from baseline at 52 weeks; primary care; refractory IBS; 35% missing data (said to be missing-at-random)Moderate
pain score1 trial; 81 patients; from RCT; (parallel design);MD=−14.4 (95%CI −24.69, − 4.11)Statistically significant, favours hypnotherapy. Baseline scores ~54GoodDirectPreciseconsistent--Change from baseline at 12 weeks (follow up 7 weeks after end of treatment); primary care; refractory IBSHigh
pain score1 trial; 81 patients; from RCT; (parallel design);MD=−0.6 (95%CI −13.27, 12.07)Not significant. Baseline scores ~54Poor drop outsDirectPreciseconsistent---Change from baseline at 52 weeks; primary care; refractory IBS; 35% missing data (said to be missing-at- random)Moderate
pain score1 trial; 30 patients; from RCT; (parallel design);MD=−9.4 (95%CI 0, 0)Statistically significant, favours hypnotherapy; SDs not given, but p<0.0001. Scale 0–21.GoodIndirect setting-minor, secondary care OPDSparse dataconsistent---Severe refractory IBS. Secondary care. Two therapies delivered by same therapist - possible therapist effect.Moderate/Low
Bloating score1 trial; 30 patients; from RCT; (parallel design);MD=−10 (95%CI 0, 0)Statistically significant, favours hypnotherapy; SDs not given, but p<0.0001. Scale 0–21.GoodIndirect setting-minor, secondary care OPDSparse dataconsistent---Severe refractory IBS. Secondary care. Two therapies delivered by same therapist - possible therapist effect.Moderate/Low
Diarrhoea1 trial; 81 patients; from RCT; (parallel design);MD=−7.9 (95%CI −16.29, 0.49)Not statistically significant, favours hypnotherapy. Baseline scores ~33GoodDirectPreciseconsistent---Change from baseline at 12 weeks (follow up 7 weeks after end of treatment); primary care; refractory IBSHigh
Constipation1 trial; 81 patients; from RCT; (parallel design);MD=−2.4 (95%CI −11.61, 6.81)Not statistically significant, favours hypnotherapy. Baseline scores ~38GoodDirectPreciseconsistent---Change from baseline at 12 weeks (follow up 7 weeks after end of treatment); primary care; refractory IBSHigh
Quality of life1 trial; 81 patients; from RCT; (parallel design);MD=8.7 (95%CI −2.82, 20.22)Not significant, favours hypnotherapy. Baseline score ~50GoodDirectFairly wide CIconsistent---Overall QoL scores at 12 weeks (follow up 7 weeks after end of treatment); primary care; refractory IBSModerate
Quality of life1 trial; 81 patients; from RCT; (parallel design);MD=9.5 (95%CI −3.67, 22.67)Not significant, favours hypnotherapy. Baseline score ~50GoodDirectFairly wide CIconsistent---Overall QoL scores at 6 months; primary care; refractory IBSModerate
Quality of life1 trial; 81 patients; from RCT; (parallel design);MD=9.6 (95%CI −3.75, 22.95)Not significant, favours hypnotherapy. Baseline score ~50Poor drop outsDirectFairly wide CIconsistent---Overall QoL scores at 12 months; primary care; refractory IBS; 35% missing data (said to be missing-at-random)Moderate/Low
other medication use1 trial; 81 patients; from RCT; (parallel design);RR=0.61 (95%CI 0.4, 0.94)Statistically significant, favours hypnotherapy. Control group rate 79%Poor drop outsDirectFairly wide CIconsistent---Prescription medication over 12 months; primary care; refractory IBS; 35% missing data (said to be missing-at-random)Moderate/Low

From: Appendix F, Grading the evidence

Cover of Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Adults
Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Adults: Diagnosis and Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Primary Care [Internet].
NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 61.
National Collaborating Centre for Nursing and Supportive Care (UK).
Copyright © 2008, Royal College of Nursing.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.