Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 6

1.

Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.

van der Beek FB, Briaire JJ, van der Marel KS, Verbist BM, Frijns JH.

Audiol Neurootol. 2016;21(1):54-67. doi: 10.1159/000442513. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

2.

Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.

van der Marel KS, Briaire JJ, Wolterbeek R, Verbist BM, Frijns JH.

Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):473-82. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000266.

PMID:
26760199
3.

The influence of cochlear implant electrode position on performance.

van der Marel KS, Briaire JJ, Verbist BM, Muurling TJ, Frijns JH.

Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20(3):202-11. doi: 10.1159/000377616. Epub 2015 Apr 28.

PMID:
25924706
4.

Diversity in cochlear morphology and its influence on cochlear implant electrode position.

van der Marel KS, Briaire JJ, Wolterbeek R, Snel-Bongers J, Verbist BM, Frijns JH.

Ear Hear. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):e9-20. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000436256.06395.63.

PMID:
24196418
5.

Electrode migration in cochlear implant patients: not an exception.

van der Marel KS, Verbist BM, Briaire JJ, Joemai RM, Frijns JH.

Audiol Neurootol. 2012;17(5):275-81. doi: 10.1159/000338475. Epub 2012 May 23.

PMID:
22627581
6.

Cochlear reimplantation with same device: surgical and audiologic results.

van der Marel KS, Briaire JJ, Verbist BM, Joemai RM, Boermans PP, Peek FA, Frijns JH.

Laryngoscope. 2011 Jul;121(7):1517-24. doi: 10.1002/lary.21722. Epub 2011 Jun 6.

PMID:
21647889
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Write to the Help Desk